Specify what result types we expect in our Qiskit result conversion functions #406
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Adds parameters to
qiskit_result_to_backendresult
/qiskit_experimentresult_to_backendresult
to specify which type of results we expect to have back.Previously, circuits with classical bits submitted to AerStateBackend would have a
counts
field in their returned result, because Qiskit reads from the classical register memory. Now we don't set that, because we don't expect counts to be returned from AerStateBackend so we ignore that field.Also, we weren't ever passing in anything to
ppcirc
inqiskit_experimentresult_to_backendresult
, so after discussion with @cqc-melf and @cqc-alec that's been removed as part of this PR.Related issues
Please mention any github issues addressed by this PR.
Checklist