Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add solvePseudoSteadyStateProblem() in cython interface #592

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Feb 11, 2019
Merged

Add solvePseudoSteadyStateProblem() in cython interface #592

merged 5 commits into from
Feb 11, 2019

Conversation

lavdwall
Copy link
Contributor

@lavdwall lavdwall commented Feb 2, 2019

This fixes my post in the Cantera Users' Group:
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/cantera-users/cZZXmLGPXaM/qpwBDh47GAAJ

Copy link
Member

@speth speth left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The implementation looks good to me. I just have a small question about the docstring.


def advance_coverages_to_steady_state(self):
"""
This method advances the surface coverages to (pseudo) steady state.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I know this comes from the name of the underlying method, but can you either explain what "pseudo" means here, or remove it from the description, depending on what you think makes more sense?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

For me it is OK just to remove it from the description.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you push a revised version of the PR, then?

@speth speth merged commit cb56209 into Cantera:master Feb 11, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants