[TEST] Gzip GeoJSON #1187
Closed
[TEST] Gzip GeoJSON #1187
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Closed
alrocar
reviewed
Nov 11, 2019
| <!-- base64-js --> | ||
| <script src='https://libs.cartocdn.com/cartoframes/dependencies/base64.js'></script> | ||
|
|
||
| <!-- pako --> |
houndci-bot
reviewed
Nov 15, 2019
|
We will implement this compression: #1202 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR is a test using Gzip(+Base64) compression for the GeoJSON data in the visualizations.
Related to #1188
Advantages
It compresses the data to less than 10%. The compression time is a bit faster than pure-base64-encoding time. The decompression time is similar to pure-base64-decoding. It's a standard compression. It doesn't require extra Python dependencies. It does not require the JS Base64 dependency anymore.
Disadvantages
It requires an external JS dependency.