2015 OSGeo Code Sprint #1

[jawntehrani]

On the Cesium Up and Running Page, the following phrasing is a bit confusing...

"While the application is small, it has everything we need to begin a larger one. We’ll break down the four most important lines.

1. The first step is to include Cesium.js in a script tag. This defines the Cesium object, which contains everything we need."

in particular, the "need to begin-include" because it gave me the impression I need to add these pieces.

Recommend rephrasing to indicate these are the 4 core pieces of a CesiumJS App.

[jawntehrani]

In the Visualizing Spatial Data Tutorial:

I recommend flip flopping the following sentences ...

When fill is set to true, the material property determines what that filling looks like. In our next example, let’s create a translucent blue ellipse. By default, fill is true and outline is false, so we only need to specify material.

and styling the last false consistently with the other properties.

[jawntehrani]

Keeping the content intact, consider making the Visualizing Spatial Data tutorial multiple mini tutorials.

[hpinkos]

Thank you for the recommendations! I tweaked the wording in the up-and-running page slightly, but I think the wording in the tutorial makes sense the way it is.

[biomassives]

This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.

A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
recipients. This is a temporary error. The following address(es) deferred:

acmeideal@gmail.com
Domain biomassiv.es has exceeded the max emails per hour (105/100 (105%)) allowed. Message will be reattempted later

------- This is a copy of the message, including all the headers. ------
Received: from github-smtp2-ext3.iad.github.net ([192.30.252.194]:60419 helo=github-smtp2b-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net)
by server23.websitehostserver.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256)
(Exim 4.85)
(envelope-from noreply@github.com)
id 1ZmS5O-003HRp-G3
for greg@biomassiv.es; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 14:51:43 -0500
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 12:51:41 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com;
s=pf2014; t=1444852301;
bh=ps1e0yymSd1wl1fsvQlwndrcKWOHsFGeGqAVxRf6orQ=;
h=From:Reply-To:To:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID:
List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From;
b=obuSaG4AkKe/9FjpT7LahSMjoj/Vllt2hOPCgcO5zE3i7VAwlDH6RKvfytdVK/hsn
vQzg+v3+D3K/ZuxoEIaSZ21daoAmlcgufJfGH3pOIFHnK9Dreip+ONkgq3PBXN8uYy
8ZxltkF3eVkaTXkYZfP548KFXvw6GPg1epIqrj08=
From: Hannah notifications@github.com
Reply-To: AnalyticalGraphicsInc/cesium reply@reply.github.com
To: AnalyticalGraphicsInc/cesium cesium@noreply.github.com
Message-ID: AnalyticalGraphicsInc/cesium/issue/2483/issue_event/435643084@github.com
In-Reply-To: AnalyticalGraphicsInc/cesium/issues/2483@github.com
References: AnalyticalGraphicsInc/cesium/issues/2483@github.com
Subject: Re: [cesium] 2015 OSGeo Code Sprint #1 (#2483)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="--==_mimepart_561eb24dca6be_208c3fde667fb2bc2445b2";
charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: hpinkos
X-GitHub-Recipient: biomassives
List-ID: AnalyticalGraphicsInc/cesium
<cesium.AnalyticalGraphicsInc.github.com>
List-Archive: https://github.com/AnalyticalGraphicsInc/cesium
List-Post: mailto:reply@reply.github.com
List-Unsubscribe: mailto:unsub+0042d4e28c2a3d9db4a9fbc7232f979ab651f58944b284cf92cf000000011236744d92a169ce0368c146@reply.github.com,
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe/AELU4hzzHO0fR5ivHLTt7Pxk0xhWe3Wbks5o7qnNgaJpZM4DeaLf
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: greg@biomassiv.es
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0
X-Spam-Score: 0
X-Spam-Bar: /
X-Ham-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "server23.websitehostserver.net",
has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
root@localhost for details.

Content preview: Closed #2483. --- Reply to this email directly or view it
on GitHub: #2483 (comment)
Closed #2483. [...]

Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required)

pts rule name description

---

0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked.
See
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
for more information.
[URIs: github.com]
-1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
[score: 0.0000]
2.1 HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_12 BODY: HTML: images with 800-1200 bytes of words
0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's
domain
0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid
-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
-0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4 RBL: Very Good reputation (+4)
[192.30.252.194 listed in wl.mailspike.net]
-0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders
X-Spam-Flag: NO

----==_mimepart_561eb24dca6be_208c3fde667fb2bc2445b2
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Closed #2483.

---

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#2483 (comment)
----==_mimepart_561eb24dca6be_208c3fde667fb2bc2445b2
Content-Type: text/html;
charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Closed #2483.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

----==_mimepart_561eb24dca6be_208c3fde667fb2bc2445b2--

[biomassives]

This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.

A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
recipients. This is a temporary error. The following address(es) deferred:

acmeideal@gmail.com
Domain biomassiv.es has exceeded the max emails per hour (106/100 (106%)) allowed. Message will be reattempted later

------- This is a copy of the message, including all the headers. ------
Received: from o4.sgmail.github.com ([192.254.112.99]:63490)
by server23.websitehostserver.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128)
(Exim 4.85)
(envelope-from bounces+848413-b37a-greg=biomassiv.es@sgmail.github.com)
id 1ZmS5P-003HSg-Sl
for greg@biomassiv.es; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 14:51:45 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=github.com;
h=from:reply-to:to:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe;
s=s20150108; bh=WWSwqU8HLGbqggvteBXgm/HbmOE=; b=mO9Rtl5n4Azjwd6L
SJU3dfLMp/CSn+TMGso9hEwqnuDl+mk6imhkYx22LjwF9B9yiebF2nBOY0K/Iyq7
f+jvXENJHlsukuVDJ+tYRfiEFRDhh8sx1ioxlQ0bOtQt07dlNOJ451pS0b6Y+6pi
rPb4sb0snfhE4p7XdxtnufFbkHA=
Received: by filter0857p1mdw1.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter0857p1mdw1.6868.561EB24D4B
2015-10-14 19:51:41.754733101 +0000 UTC
Received: from github-smtp2b-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net (github-smtp2b-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net [192.30.253.17])
by ismtpd0005p1iad1.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id Wdwlg_FPScKR9E_kDPAeUw
for greg@biomassiv.es; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 19:51:41.787 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 12:51:41 -0700
From: Hannah notifications@github.com
Reply-To: AnalyticalGraphicsInc/cesium reply@reply.github.com
To: AnalyticalGraphicsInc/cesium cesium@noreply.github.com
Message-ID: AnalyticalGraphicsInc/cesium/issues/2483/148176831@github.com
In-Reply-To: AnalyticalGraphicsInc/cesium/issues/2483@github.com
References: AnalyticalGraphicsInc/cesium/issues/2483@github.com
Subject: Re: [cesium] 2015 OSGeo Code Sprint #1 (#2483)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="--==_mimepart_561eb24d9d3df_209a3fde667fb2bc3129ad";
charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: hpinkos
X-GitHub-Recipient: biomassives
List-ID: AnalyticalGraphicsInc/cesium
<cesium.AnalyticalGraphicsInc.github.com>
List-Archive: https://github.com/AnalyticalGraphicsInc/cesium
List-Post: mailto:reply@reply.github.com
List-Unsubscribe: mailto:unsub+0042d4e28c2a3d9db4a9fbc7232f979ab651f58944b284cf92cf000000011236744d92a169ce0368c146@reply.github.com,
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe/AELU4hzzHO0fR5ivHLTt7Pxk0xhWe3Wbks5o7qnNgaJpZM4DeaLf
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: greg@biomassiv.es
X-SG-EID: ZlaDthyue/4HG+EgTb7JoZYs48JNb2iQtCcPV6oIs9UNjJGr8ehalJg2d87ciV+1ny3rkzpXhemHZZ
YB3lX7DY0orOqcKowMLHLMmQnHKOAYH7bxpYtLpxlP8wt99mkFpLYnl6HIVRF0Qkt34Rxwz80qTaLC
we7GijS4FK1N3FE=
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0
X-Spam-Score: 0
X-Spam-Bar: /
X-Ham-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "server23.websitehostserver.net",
has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
root@localhost for details.

Content preview: Thank you for the recommendations! I tweaked the wording in
the up-and-running page slightly, but I think the wording in the tutorial
makes sense the way it is. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on
GitHub: #2483 (comment)
[...]

Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required)

pts rule name description

---

-0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay
domain
0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked.
See
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
for more information.
[URIs: github.com]
-0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 RBL: Good reputation (+3)
[192.254.112.99 listed in wl.mailspike.net]
-1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
[score: 0.0000]
2.1 HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_12 BODY: HTML: images with 800-1200 bytes of words
0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's
domain
0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid
-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
-0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders
X-Spam-Flag: NO

----==_mimepart_561eb24d9d3df_209a3fde667fb2bc3129ad
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Thank you for the recommendations! I tweaked the wording in the up-and-running page slightly, but I think the wording in the tutorial makes sense the way it is.

---

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#2483 (comment)
----==_mimepart_561eb24d9d3df_209a3fde667fb2bc3129ad
Content-Type: text/html;
charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Thank you for the recommendations! I tweaked the wording in the up-and-running page slightly, but I think the wording in the tutorial makes sense the way it is.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

----==_mimepart_561eb24d9d3df_209a3fde667fb2bc3129ad--