Update cesiumWorkerBootstrapper.js

[CraigPatakyEDX]

Proposed change enables Cesium to work with Electron. Alters scope of variables: requirejs, require, define

This takes care of an issue as noted by Stuart Attenborrow in 2018.

See at: https://community.cesium.com/t/fixing-cesiumworkerbootstrapper-when-using-electron-react-webpack/6532

[cesium-concierge]

Thank you so much for the pull request @CraigPatakyEDX! I noticed this is your first pull request and I wanted to say welcome to the Cesium community!

The Pull Request Guidelines is a handy reference for making sure your PR gets accepted quickly, so make sure to skim that.

• ❌ Missing CONTRIBUTORS.md entry.
  • Please add yourself to the contributors file!
• ❌ Missing CLA.
  • Please send in a Contributor License Agreement (CLA) and comment back here to let us know to check this!
  • Maintainers, here's how to check for a submitted CLA.
• ❔ CHANGES.md was not updated.
  • If this change updates the public API in any way, please add a bullet point to CHANGES.md.
• ❔ Unit tests were not updated.
  • Make sure you've updated tests to reflect your changes, added tests for any new code, and ran the code coverage tool.

Reviewers, don't forget to make sure that:

• Cesium Viewer works.
• Works in 2D/CV.
• Works (or fails gracefully) in IE11.

[cesium-concierge]

Thanks again for your contribution @CraigPatakyEDX!

No one has commented on this pull request in 90 days. Maintainers, can you review, merge or close to keep things tidy?

I'm going to re-bump this in 90 days. If you'd like me to stop, just comment with @cesium-concierge stop. If you want me to start again, just delete the comment.

[CraigPatakyEDX]

I forgot if there was something else I was supposed to do with this request. I know that it is a very useful request, and that electron will not run with cesium without it.

…

On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 7:00 PM Cesium Concierge ***@***.***> wrote: Thanks again for your contribution @CraigPatakyEDX <https://github.com/CraigPatakyEDX>! No one has commented on this pull request in 90 days. Maintainers, can you review, merge or close to keep things tidy? *I'm going to re-bump this in 90 days. If you'd like me to stop, just comment with @cesium-concierge stop. If you want me to start again, just delete the comment.* — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#9573 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AST3MU5BDKW3DYCN4MPRCMDT63WTVANCNFSM45XRNDYA> . Triage notifications on the go with GitHub Mobile for iOS <https://apps.apple.com/app/apple-store/id1477376905?ct=notification-email&mt=8&pt=524675> or Android <https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.github.android&referrer=utm_campaign%3Dnotification-email%26utm_medium%3Demail%26utm_source%3Dgithub>.

[ggetz]

Thanks for the PR @CraigPatakyEDX. In order to merge you're fix, you need to do a few things:

1. Send in a Contributor License Agreement (CLA)
2. Add your name to the contributors file
3. Update CHANGES.md with a brief description of your fix.

@ebogo1 As of #9718, nothing else is blocking this fix from going in, correct?

[ggetz]

Actually, taking a closer look at this, this does not have anything to do with #9718.

The line altered is part of a verbatim copy of requireJS, and should not be modified. I do believe that there may be a fix needed or further configuration to get Cesium to play nicely with Electron across the board, however I don't think this is the right way to go about it. @CraigPatakyEDX If you're still interested in addressing the cause please open an issue with more details on how to replicate, and we can figure out the best way to resolve it.