Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

fix: use next epoch for pending balance/consolidations processing #7053

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Aug 28, 2024
Merged

fix: use next epoch for pending balance/consolidations processing #7053

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from 2 commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
64d05e0
fix: use next epoch for pending balance/consolidations processing
g11tech Aug 27, 2024
23355fa
skip electra light client spec tests as fixes pending
g11tech Aug 27, 2024
b9f0b50
ignore electra light client test at deneb
g11tech Aug 28, 2024
02b328b
Enable `incorrect_not_enough_consolidation_churn_available` spec test
nflaig Aug 28, 2024
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion packages/beacon-node/test/spec/specTestVersioning.ts
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ import {DownloadTestsOptions} from "@lodestar/spec-test-util/downloadTests";
const __dirname = path.dirname(fileURLToPath(import.meta.url));

export const ethereumConsensusSpecsTests: DownloadTestsOptions = {
specVersion: "v1.5.0-alpha.3",
specVersion: "v1.5.0-alpha.5",
// Target directory is the host package root: 'packages/*/spec-tests'
outputDir: path.join(__dirname, "../../spec-tests"),
specTestsRepoUrl: "https://github.com/ethereum/consensus-spec-tests",
Expand Down
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions packages/beacon-node/test/spec/utils/specTestIterator.ts
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -65,6 +65,7 @@ export const defaultSkipOpts: SkipOpts = {
skippedTestSuites: [
/^capella\/light_client\/single_merkle_proof\/BeaconBlockBody.*/,
/^deneb\/light_client\/single_merkle_proof\/BeaconBlockBody.*/,
/^electra\/light_client\/.*/,
],
// TODO Electra: Review this test in the next spec test release
skippedTests: [/incorrect_not_enough_consolidation_churn_available/],
Expand Down
5 changes: 2 additions & 3 deletions packages/state-transition/src/epoch/processPendingBalanceDeposits.ts
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -2,7 +2,6 @@ import {FAR_FUTURE_EPOCH} from "@lodestar/params";
import {CachedBeaconStateElectra, EpochTransitionCache} from "../types.js";
import {increaseBalance} from "../util/balance.js";
import {getActivationExitChurnLimit} from "../util/validator.js";
import {getCurrentEpoch} from "../util/epoch.js";

/**
* Starting from Electra:
Expand All @@ -14,8 +13,8 @@ import {getCurrentEpoch} from "../util/epoch.js";
* TODO Electra: Update ssz library to support batch push to `pendingBalanceDeposits`
*/
export function processPendingBalanceDeposits(state: CachedBeaconStateElectra, cache: EpochTransitionCache): void {
const nextEpoch = state.epochCtx.epoch + 1;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I really like the name upcomingEpoch made by @matthewkeil for processEpoch code in his async shuffling PR #6938

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yea name is good but i think good to be closer to naming used in specs, though not a strong opinion

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1 on following spec naming, I think we should have a good reason if we wanna deviate from terms used in spec.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, if we really have a problem with the naming, we should aim to update it in the spec instead. Deviating off standards create more context loss for new people reading our code IMO.

const availableForProcessing = state.depositBalanceToConsume + BigInt(getActivationExitChurnLimit(state.epochCtx));
const currentEpoch = getCurrentEpoch(state);
let processedAmount = 0n;
let nextDepositIndex = 0;
const depositsToPostpone = [];
Expand All @@ -28,7 +27,7 @@ export function processPendingBalanceDeposits(state: CachedBeaconStateElectra, c

// Validator is exiting, postpone the deposit until after withdrawable epoch
if (validator.exitEpoch < FAR_FUTURE_EPOCH) {
if (currentEpoch <= validator.withdrawableEpoch) {
if (nextEpoch <= validator.withdrawableEpoch) {
depositsToPostpone.push(deposit);
} else {
// Deposited balance will never become active. Increase balance but do not consume churn
Expand Down
3 changes: 2 additions & 1 deletion packages/state-transition/src/epoch/processPendingConsolidations.ts
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ import {switchToCompoundingValidator} from "../util/electra.js";
*
*/
export function processPendingConsolidations(state: CachedBeaconStateElectra, cache: EpochTransitionCache): void {
const nextEpoch = state.epochCtx.epoch + 1;
let nextPendingConsolidation = 0;
const validators = state.validators;
const cachedBalances = cache.balances;
Expand All @@ -32,7 +33,7 @@ export function processPendingConsolidations(state: CachedBeaconStateElectra, ca
continue;
}

if (sourceValidator.withdrawableEpoch > state.epochCtx.epoch) {
if (sourceValidator.withdrawableEpoch > nextEpoch) {
break;
}
// Churn any target excess active balance of target and raise its max
Expand Down
Loading