Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: Determine if Tencent is authorized #5288

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 19, 2024

Conversation

zhangjian10
Copy link
Contributor

@zhangjian10 zhangjian10 commented Aug 18, 2024

💻 变更类型 | Change Type

  • feat
  • [ x] fix
  • refactor
  • perf
  • style
  • test
  • docs
  • ci
  • chore
  • build

🔀 变更说明 | Description of Change

修复腾讯判断是否授权

📝 补充信息 | Additional Information

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Corrected the invocation of the access validation method to improve access control logic.
    • Ensured proper execution of the method, enhancing the reliability of access checks.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Aug 18, 2024

@zhangjian10 is attempting to deploy a commit to the NextChat Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 18, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent change in the app/store/access.ts file improves the useAccessStore function by correcting the invocation of the isValidTencent method. By replacing the property reference with a method call, this update ensures the function executes as intended, enhancing the logic behind access control checks. This modification is crucial for maintaining accurate access validation within the application.

Changes

Files Change Summary
app/store/access.ts Updated useAccessStore to call isValidTencent as a method instead of referencing it as a property, improving access control logic.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant AccessStore

    User->>AccessStore: Request access
    AccessStore->>AccessStore: Check isValidTencent()
    AccessStore-->>User: Grant or deny access
Loading

Poem

🐇 In the code where bunnies hop,
A method's call made logic pop!
With each correction, access made right,
In the store, all functions take flight!
Let's celebrate this little fix,
With joyful jumps and coding tricks! 🎉


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 495b321 and 1102ef6.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • app/store/access.ts (1 hunks)
Additional context used
Learnings (2)
Common learnings
Learnt from: lloydzhou
PR: ChatGPTNextWeb/ChatGPT-Next-Web#4925
File: app/store/access.ts:86-88
Timestamp: 2024-07-04T15:40:31.080Z
Learning: The function name `isValidaBaidu` in `app/store/access.ts` should be corrected to `isValidBaidu`.
app/store/access.ts (1)
Learnt from: lloydzhou
PR: ChatGPTNextWeb/ChatGPT-Next-Web#4925
File: app/store/access.ts:86-88
Timestamp: 2024-07-04T15:40:31.080Z
Learning: The function name `isValidaBaidu` in `app/store/access.ts` should be corrected to `isValidBaidu`.
Additional comments not posted (1)
app/store/access.ts (1)

186-186: Correct invocation of isValidTencent.

The change from this.isValidTencent to this.isValidTencent() ensures that the method is executed, which is essential for the proper functioning of the authorization logic.

Copy link
Contributor

Your build has completed!

Preview deployment

@Dogtiti Dogtiti merged commit 1e59948 into ChatGPTNextWeb:main Aug 19, 2024
1 of 2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants