filecoin-station/core@18
#1296
filecoin-station/core@18
#1296
Conversation
Bumps [@filecoin-station/core](https://github.com/filecoin-station/core) from 17.0.1 to 18.0.0. - [Release notes](https://github.com/filecoin-station/core/releases) - [Commits](CheckerNetwork/node@v17.0.1...v18.0.0) --- updated-dependencies: - dependency-name: "@filecoin-station/core" dependency-type: direct:production update-type: version-update:semver-major ... Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
|
New and removed dependencies detected. Learn more about Socket for GitHub ↗︎
🚮 Removed packages: npm/@filecoin-station/core@17.0.1 |
|
🚨 Potential security issues detected. Learn more about Socket for GitHub ↗︎ To accept the risk, merge this PR and you will not be notified again.
Next stepsWhat is an install script?Install scripts are run when the package is installed. The majority of malware in npm is hidden in install scripts. Packages should not be running non-essential scripts during install and there are often solutions to problems people solve with install scripts that can be run at publish time instead. Take a deeper look at the dependencyTake a moment to review the security alert above. Review the linked package source code to understand the potential risk. Ensure the package is not malicious before proceeding. If you're unsure how to proceed, reach out to your security team or ask the Socket team for help at support [AT] socket [DOT] dev. Remove the packageIf you happen to install a dependency that Socket reports as Known Malware you should immediately remove it and select a different dependency. For other alert types, you may may wish to investigate alternative packages or consider if there are other ways to mitigate the specific risk posed by the dependency. Mark a package as acceptable riskTo ignore an alert, reply with a comment starting with
|
| this.#online = true | ||
| } else if (activity.message === 'SPARK failed reporting retrieval') { | ||
| this.#online = false | ||
| const firstWord = activity.message.split(' ')[0].toLowerCase() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I chose to make this a bit more dynamic, as I think it was getting too verbose and too easy to break when iterating on messages. It can produce false results too, so it's not a finished solution, but in my mind an improvement. Happy to follow up on this
|
@bajtos hindsight please 🙏 |
No description provided.