Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

make op_div behave like mempool and post soft-fork #113

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

arvidn
Copy link
Contributor

@arvidn arvidn commented Mar 24, 2022

No description provided.

@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
]

dev_dependencies = [
"clvm_tools>=0.4.2",
"clvm_tools>=0.4.4",
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I believe the tests rely on the most recent version of clvm_tools now, since we changed the cost reporting

@arvidn arvidn requested a review from richardkiss March 24, 2022 20:35
Copy link
Contributor

@richardkiss richardkiss left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems fine. I'd really like to have dialect support in python clvm, but that's kind of out of scope of this PR. Would you consider maybe just creating a new version of op_div and renaming the existing one op_div_original or something? That way if and when we get around to adding dialect support to clvm we can resurrect the old behaviour as a particular (admittedly fairly useless except maybe for historical forensics) dialect.

@arvidn
Copy link
Contributor Author

arvidn commented Mar 29, 2022

I don't see a lot of value in preserving the old behaviour. We don't use it. If someone will wants that behaviour in the future, it's easy to add back.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants