Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Resource for DHCP Relay Policy #155

Closed
PhilipWhiteside opened this issue Nov 3, 2020 · 3 comments
Closed

Resource for DHCP Relay Policy #155

PhilipWhiteside opened this issue Nov 3, 2020 · 3 comments

Comments

@PhilipWhiteside
Copy link

PhilipWhiteside commented Nov 3, 2020

Community Note

  • Please vote on this issue by adding a 👍 reaction to the original issue to help the community and maintainers prioritize this request
  • Please do not leave "+1" or other comments that do not add relevant new information or questions, they generate extra noise for issue followers and do not help prioritize the request
  • If you are interested in working on this issue or have submitted a pull request, please leave a comment

Description

A resource to create a DHCP Relay Policy. To then be mapped into a BD.

New or Affected Resource(s) + ACI Class(es):

  • dhcpRsProv

APIC version and APIC Platform

  • V 4.2 and on-prem

Potential Terraform Configuration

resource "aci_dhcp_policy" "default" {
  tenant_dn = data.aci_tenant.default.id
  name = "umbrella_dns"
  provider = l3out
  server = 202.x.x.x
}

References

@AshuSoni-crest
Copy link
Contributor

AshuSoni-crest commented May 5, 2021

We have resolved this issue, You will receive the updates in the next release of terraform-provider-aci v0.6.0. Let me know if you have any other queries.

@makenfix
Copy link

Has this been included in v0.6? I am having difficulty setting the DHCP server IP.
I can set the tDn for the DHCP Policy EPG with the "relation_dhcp_rs_prov" argument in the "aci_dhcp_relay_policy" resource, but there doesn't seem to be an argument for setting the server IP.

@lhercot
Copy link
Member

lhercot commented Jun 15, 2021

Yes it is in v0.6 I will be closing this. Please re-open an issue if you still have problems with this ask.

@lhercot lhercot closed this as completed Jun 15, 2021
RutvikS-crest added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 5, 2022
* Updated Read function in access_switch_policy_group

* User security role update (#151)

* Updated fabricNodeControl and userSecurityDomainRole

* Updated user security domain

* Updated Read Function for UI Deletion Test case (#152)

* added set for annotation in ldap_group_map

* Updated resources (#155)

* aaep_to_domain resource file updated, dn changed and description removed (#156)

* updated documentation

* updated documentation for match_rule

* resource_tagannotation updated (#159)

Co-authored-by: Parth-CDS <parth.patel@crestdatasys.com>

* tag_resource schema updated

* Updated Index file of Interface Blacklist

* Updated Mgmt Zone (#162)

* updated docs
RutvikS-crest added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 5, 2022
* Updated Read function in access_switch_policy_group

* User security role update (#151)

* Updated fabricNodeControl and userSecurityDomainRole

* Updated user security domain

* Updated Read Function for UI Deletion Test case (#152)

* added set for annotation in ldap_group_map

* Updated resources (#155)

* aaep_to_domain resource file updated, dn changed and description removed (#156)

* updated documentation

* updated documentation for match_rule

* resource_tagannotation updated (#159)

* tag_resource schema updated

* Updated Index file of Interface Blacklist

* Updated Mgmt Zone (#162)

* updated docs
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants