-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 99
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[minor_change] Add datasource and resource for fvFBRoute in aci_vrf_f… #1227
Conversation
0972556
to
1e9dfb0
Compare
CI failing because of introduced dependency in main.go, please ignore during review asked @samiib already to have a look |
edfdf7b
to
1e9dfb0
Compare
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #1227 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 85.08% 85.24% +0.15%
==========================================
Files 59 61 +2
Lines 16619 17263 +644
==========================================
+ Hits 14140 14715 +575
- Misses 1802 1848 +46
- Partials 677 700 +23 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
I tried adding the new dependency as an import in generator.go to force it to be downloaded to vendor but that wasn't working. See: edfdf7b I don't see any other way to get this into vendor as it's not really intended to be used to vendor programs. The vendor command will only find packages required to build the provider and other programs are not really required to build it, just generate it. For now I got around this by adding -mod=mod to the single generate command. @lhercot - This may be the one exception to having everything in vendor. What do you think? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM!
c48b6c1
Thank you @lhercot for suggesting a different method of specifying the tool dependency in the provider. |
c48b6c1
to
1f32250
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM!
b16c75d
a2bd622
to
b16c75d
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
…allback_route and aci_vrf_fallback_route_group
b16c75d
to
962f137
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
…allback_route and aci_vrf_fallback_route_group
fixes #1185