Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix PartsSplitter #62268

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Apr 8, 2024
Merged

Fix PartsSplitter #62268

merged 5 commits into from
Apr 8, 2024

Conversation

nickitat
Copy link
Member

@nickitat nickitat commented Apr 3, 2024

Changelog category (leave one):

  • Bug Fix

Changelog entry:

When some index columns are not loaded into memory for some parts of a *MergeTree table, queries with FINAL might produce wrong results. Now we explicitly choose only the common prefix of index columns for all parts to avoid this issue.


Related: #62173 #62192 #62252

cc @nikitamikhaylov @jkartseva

@robot-ch-test-poll3 robot-ch-test-poll3 added the pr-not-for-changelog This PR should not be mentioned in the changelog label Apr 3, 2024
@robot-ch-test-poll3
Copy link
Contributor

robot-ch-test-poll3 commented Apr 3, 2024

This is an automated comment for commit 378d330 with description of existing statuses. It's updated for the latest CI running

❌ Click here to open a full report in a separate page

Check nameDescriptionStatus
AST fuzzerRuns randomly generated queries to catch program errors. The build type is optionally given in parenthesis. If it fails, ask a maintainer for help❌ failure
Bugfix validationChecks that either a new test (functional or integration) or there some changed tests that fail with the binary built on master branch❌ failure
CI runningA meta-check that indicates the running CI. Normally, it's in success or pending state. The failed status indicates some problems with the PR⏳ pending
Performance ComparisonMeasure changes in query performance. The performance test report is described in detail here. In square brackets are the optional part/total tests❌ failure
Stateful testsRuns stateful functional tests for ClickHouse binaries built in various configurations -- release, debug, with sanitizers, etc❌ failure
Stateless testsRuns stateless functional tests for ClickHouse binaries built in various configurations -- release, debug, with sanitizers, etc❌ failure
Stress testRuns stateless functional tests concurrently from several clients to detect concurrency-related errors❌ failure
Successful checks
Check nameDescriptionStatus
A SyncThere's no description for the check yet, please add it to tests/ci/ci_config.py:CHECK_DESCRIPTIONS✅ success
ClickBenchRuns [ClickBench](https://github.com/ClickHouse/ClickBench/) with instant-attach table✅ success
ClickHouse build checkBuilds ClickHouse in various configurations for use in further steps. You have to fix the builds that fail. Build logs often has enough information to fix the error, but you might have to reproduce the failure locally. The cmake options can be found in the build log, grepping for cmake. Use these options and follow the general build process✅ success
Compatibility checkChecks that clickhouse binary runs on distributions with old libc versions. If it fails, ask a maintainer for help✅ success
Docker keeper imageThe check to build and optionally push the mentioned image to docker hub✅ success
Docker server imageThe check to build and optionally push the mentioned image to docker hub✅ success
Docs checkBuilds and tests the documentation✅ success
Fast testNormally this is the first check that is ran for a PR. It builds ClickHouse and runs most of stateless functional tests, omitting some. If it fails, further checks are not started until it is fixed. Look at the report to see which tests fail, then reproduce the failure locally as described here✅ success
Flaky testsChecks if new added or modified tests are flaky by running them repeatedly, in parallel, with more randomization. Functional tests are run 100 times with address sanitizer, and additional randomization of thread scheduling. Integrational tests are run up to 10 times. If at least once a new test has failed, or was too long, this check will be red. We don't allow flaky tests, read the doc✅ success
Install packagesChecks that the built packages are installable in a clear environment✅ success
Integration testsThe integration tests report. In parenthesis the package type is given, and in square brackets are the optional part/total tests✅ success
Mergeable CheckChecks if all other necessary checks are successful✅ success
PR CheckThere's no description for the check yet, please add it to tests/ci/ci_config.py:CHECK_DESCRIPTIONS✅ success
Style checkRuns a set of checks to keep the code style clean. If some of tests failed, see the related log from the report✅ success
Unit testsRuns the unit tests for different release types✅ success
Upgrade checkRuns stress tests on server version from last release and then tries to upgrade it to the version from the PR. It checks if the new server can successfully startup without any errors, crashes or sanitizer asserts✅ success

@nickitat
Copy link
Member Author

nickitat commented Apr 4, 2024

apparently problem is coming from recent optimisation of not loading some index columns. splitting on layers was incorrect, for one part instead of range (0, 4) we took only (0, 2). I noticed that for it we use only first column value as the index value, while the index consists of 3 columns. then I set primary_key_ratio_of_unique_prefix_values_to_skip_suffix_columns=1 and it fixed the test.

Copy link

clickhouse-ci bot commented Apr 4, 2024

This is an automatic comment. The PR descriptions does not match the template.

Please, edit it accordingly.

The error is: Changelog entry required for category 'Bug Fix'

@nickitat nickitat added pr-bugfix Pull request with bugfix, not backported by default and removed pr-not-for-changelog This PR should not be mentioned in the changelog labels Apr 4, 2024
@nickitat nickitat changed the title Test for smth that looks like a bug in parts splitter Fix PartsSplitter Apr 4, 2024
@nickitat nickitat marked this pull request as ready for review April 5, 2024 12:33
@@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
import pytest
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This could be a functional test.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

But the test restarts ClickHouse server.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yep, I'm not aware of a way to trigger index optimisation w/o server restart

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

DETACH/ATTACH a table.

Copy link
Member

@alexey-milovidov alexey-milovidov left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

.

@alexey-milovidov alexey-milovidov self-assigned this Apr 5, 2024
@nickitat
Copy link
Member Author

nickitat commented Apr 8, 2024

as some of us already noticed, 00147_global_in_aggregate_function failed in CI with this fix.

https://s3.amazonaws.com/clickhouse-test-reports/62268/378d330d9dfa289c413f80c2addaf6dee5503093/stateful_tests__tsan_.html

though it seems there is a different issue, because this test fails almost in 100% cases with the following settings:

set merge_tree_read_split_ranges_into_intersecting_and_non_intersecting_injection_probability=0,
allow_prefetched_read_pool_for_remote_filesystem=0,
max_block_size=69749, max_threads=32;

yep, it is analyzer.

#62451

@nickitat nickitat added this pull request to the merge queue Apr 8, 2024
Merged via the queue into ClickHouse:master with commit 5b4f67c Apr 8, 2024
219 of 235 checks passed
@nickitat nickitat deleted the test_for_bug branch April 8, 2024 15:54
@robot-ch-test-poll robot-ch-test-poll added the pr-synced-to-cloud The PR is synced to the cloud repo label Apr 8, 2024
robot-clickhouse added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 8, 2024
@robot-ch-test-poll2 robot-ch-test-poll2 added the pr-backports-created Backport PRs are successfully created, it won't be processed by CI script anymore label Apr 8, 2024
nikitamikhaylov added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 8, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
pr-backports-created Backport PRs are successfully created, it won't be processed by CI script anymore pr-backports-created-cloud pr-bugfix Pull request with bugfix, not backported by default pr-must-backport-cloud pr-synced-to-cloud The PR is synced to the cloud repo v24.3-must-backport
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants