Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Enable plain_rewritable metadata for local and azure object storages #63365

Merged

Conversation

jkartseva
Copy link
Contributor

Changelog category (leave one):

  • Improvement

Changelog entry (a user-readable short description of the changes that goes to CHANGELOG.md):

Enable plain_rewritable metadata for local and Azure (azure_blob_storage) object storages.

Documentation entry for user-facing changes

  • Documentation is written (mandatory for new features)

Information about CI checks: https://clickhouse.com/docs/en/development/continuous-integration/

Modify your CI run

NOTE: If your merge the PR with modified CI you MUST KNOW what you are doing
NOTE: Checked options will be applied if set before CI RunConfig/PrepareRunConfig step

Include tests (required builds will be added automatically):

  • Fast test
  • Integration Tests
  • Stateless tests
  • Stateful tests
  • Unit tests
  • Performance tests
  • All with ASAN
  • All with TSAN
  • All with Analyzer
  • All with Azure
  • Add your option here

Exclude tests:

  • Fast test
  • Integration Tests
  • Stateless tests
  • Stateful tests
  • Performance tests
  • All with ASAN
  • All with TSAN
  • All with MSAN
  • All with UBSAN
  • All with Coverage
  • All with Aarch64
  • Add your option here

Extra options:

  • do not test (only style check)
  • disable merge-commit (no merge from master before tests)
  • disable CI cache (job reuse)

Only specified batches in multi-batch jobs:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

@jkartseva jkartseva added the can be tested Allows running workflows for external contributors label May 4, 2024
@robot-ch-test-poll4 robot-ch-test-poll4 added the pr-improvement Pull request with some product improvements label May 4, 2024
@robot-ch-test-poll4
Copy link
Contributor

robot-ch-test-poll4 commented May 4, 2024

This is an automated comment for commit fcad15f with description of existing statuses. It's updated for the latest CI running

❌ Click here to open a full report in a separate page

Check nameDescriptionStatus
CI runningA meta-check that indicates the running CI. Normally, it's in success or pending state. The failed status indicates some problems with the PR⏳ pending
Stateless testsRuns stateless functional tests for ClickHouse binaries built in various configurations -- release, debug, with sanitizers, etc❌ failure
Successful checks
Check nameDescriptionStatus
A SyncThere's no description for the check yet, please add it to tests/ci/ci_config.py:CHECK_DESCRIPTIONS✅ success
AST fuzzerRuns randomly generated queries to catch program errors. The build type is optionally given in parenthesis. If it fails, ask a maintainer for help✅ success
ClickBenchRuns [ClickBench](https://github.com/ClickHouse/ClickBench/) with instant-attach table✅ success
ClickHouse build checkBuilds ClickHouse in various configurations for use in further steps. You have to fix the builds that fail. Build logs often has enough information to fix the error, but you might have to reproduce the failure locally. The cmake options can be found in the build log, grepping for cmake. Use these options and follow the general build process✅ success
Compatibility checkChecks that clickhouse binary runs on distributions with old libc versions. If it fails, ask a maintainer for help✅ success
Docker keeper imageThe check to build and optionally push the mentioned image to docker hub✅ success
Docker server imageThe check to build and optionally push the mentioned image to docker hub✅ success
Docs checkBuilds and tests the documentation✅ success
Fast testNormally this is the first check that is ran for a PR. It builds ClickHouse and runs most of stateless functional tests, omitting some. If it fails, further checks are not started until it is fixed. Look at the report to see which tests fail, then reproduce the failure locally as described here✅ success
Flaky testsChecks if new added or modified tests are flaky by running them repeatedly, in parallel, with more randomization. Functional tests are run 100 times with address sanitizer, and additional randomization of thread scheduling. Integrational tests are run up to 10 times. If at least once a new test has failed, or was too long, this check will be red. We don't allow flaky tests, read the doc✅ success
Install packagesChecks that the built packages are installable in a clear environment✅ success
Integration testsThe integration tests report. In parenthesis the package type is given, and in square brackets are the optional part/total tests✅ success
Mergeable CheckChecks if all other necessary checks are successful✅ success
PR CheckThere's no description for the check yet, please add it to tests/ci/ci_config.py:CHECK_DESCRIPTIONS✅ success
Performance ComparisonMeasure changes in query performance. The performance test report is described in detail here. In square brackets are the optional part/total tests✅ success
Stateful testsRuns stateful functional tests for ClickHouse binaries built in various configurations -- release, debug, with sanitizers, etc✅ success
Stress testRuns stateless functional tests concurrently from several clients to detect concurrency-related errors✅ success
Style checkRuns a set of checks to keep the code style clean. If some of tests failed, see the related log from the report✅ success
Unit testsRuns the unit tests for different release types✅ success
Upgrade checkRuns stress tests on server version from last release and then tries to upgrade it to the version from the PR. It checks if the new server can successfully startup without any errors, crashes or sanitizer asserts✅ success

@jkartseva jkartseva force-pushed the support-generic-disk-s3-plain-rw branch from e7a219d to 18efeca Compare May 4, 2024 05:05
@jkartseva jkartseva marked this pull request as draft May 4, 2024 06:53
@jkartseva jkartseva force-pushed the support-generic-disk-s3-plain-rw branch 6 times, most recently from 5e826d0 to d051655 Compare May 7, 2024 03:47
Enable plain_rewritable support for local and azure (azure_blob_storage)
metadata type.

- HDFS object storage currently does not support iteration
  and does not implement listObjects method. It's a blocker
  for enabling plain_rewritable metadata type with HDFS.
- StaticWeb object storage is read-only and works with
  its dedicated metadata type.
@jkartseva jkartseva force-pushed the support-generic-disk-s3-plain-rw branch from d051655 to fcad15f Compare May 7, 2024 03:53
@jkartseva jkartseva marked this pull request as ready for review May 7, 2024 06:05
@kssenii kssenii self-assigned this May 7, 2024
/// TODO(jkartseva@): Test support for generic disk type
if (type != ObjectStorageType::S3)
throw Exception(ErrorCodes::NOT_IMPLEMENTED, "plain_rewritable metadata storage support is implemented only for S3");
/// HDFS object storage currently does not support iteration and does not implement listObjects method.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

JFYI, listObjects for hdfs object storage is added in #59767, so this can be adjusted afterwards.

@jkartseva jkartseva added this pull request to the merge queue May 7, 2024
Merged via the queue into ClickHouse:master with commit fc9fa70 May 7, 2024
228 of 231 checks passed
@jkartseva jkartseva deleted the support-generic-disk-s3-plain-rw branch May 7, 2024 19:57
@robot-clickhouse-ci-2 robot-clickhouse-ci-2 added the pr-synced-to-cloud The PR is synced to the cloud repo label May 7, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
can be tested Allows running workflows for external contributors pr-improvement Pull request with some product improvements pr-synced-to-cloud The PR is synced to the cloud repo
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants