You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
-issues = value.split('\n- ')-for i, _ in enumerate(issues):- issues[i] = issues[i].strip().strip('-').strip()+if value:+ issues = value.split('\n- ')+ for i, _ in enumerate(issues):+ issues[i] = issues[i].strip().strip('-').strip()
Suggestion importance[1-10]: 9
Why: This suggestion addresses a potential issue by adding a check to ensure the value is not empty before processing, which can prevent runtime errors.
9
Maintainability
Use configuration values for thresholds to enhance maintainability
Consider using constants or configuration files for the threshold values to make them easier to manage and change without modifying the code.
Why: This suggestion improves maintainability by allowing threshold values to be managed through configuration, reducing the need to modify the code directly for changes.
8
Reduce redundancy by combining repeated code blocks for adding table rows
Combine the repeated code for adding table rows when gfm_supported is true into a single block to reduce redundancy.
Why: This suggestion improves maintainability by centralizing configuration values, making future updates easier. However, it is not crucial for functionality.
for i, _ in enumerate(issues):
- issues[i] = issues[i].strip().strip('-').strip()+ issues[i] = issues[i].strip(' \n-')
Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8
Why: This suggestion enhances code readability and efficiency by reducing redundant calls to strip().
8
Best practice
Use constants or configuration files to manage threshold values
Consider using constants or configuration files to manage threshold values, which will make it easier to adjust these values in the future without modifying the code.
Why: This suggestion improves maintainability by centralizing configuration values, but it is not crucial for the current functionality.
7
✅ Suggestions
Category
Suggestion
Score
Maintainability
Extract complex logic into separate functions for improved code organization
The code for handling 'key issues to review' is quite complex and nested. Consider extracting this logic into a separate function to improve readability and maintainability.
-elif 'key issues to review' in key_nice.lower():- value = value.strip()+def format_key_issues(value, key_nice, emoji, gfm_supported):+ markdown_text = ""
if is_value_no(value):
if gfm_supported:
- markdown_text += f"<tr><td>"- markdown_text += f"{emoji} <strong>No key issues to review</strong>"- markdown_text += f"</td></tr>\n"+ markdown_text += f"<tr><td>{emoji} <strong>No key issues to review</strong></td></tr>\n"
else:
markdown_text += f"### {emoji} No key issues to review\n\n"
else:
- issues = value.split('\n- ')- for i, _ in enumerate(issues):- issues[i] = issues[i].strip().strip('-').strip()- issues = unique_strings(issues) # remove duplicates+ issues = [issue.strip().strip('-').strip() for issue in value.split('\n- ')]+ issues = unique_strings(issues)
if gfm_supported:
- markdown_text += f"<tr><td>"- markdown_text += f"{emoji} <strong>{key_nice}</strong><br/><br/>\n\n"+ markdown_text += f"<tr><td>{emoji} <strong>{key_nice}</strong><br/><br/>\n\n"
else:
markdown_text += f"### {emoji} Key issues to review:\n\n"
- for i, issue in enumerate(issues):- if not issue:- continue- issue = emphasize_header(issue, only_markdown=True)- markdown_text += f"{issue}\n\n"+ for issue in issues:+ if issue:+ markdown_text += f"{emphasize_header(issue, only_markdown=True)}\n\n"
if gfm_supported:
- markdown_text += f"</td></tr>\n"+ markdown_text += "</td></tr>\n"+ return markdown_text+elif 'key issues to review' in key_nice.lower():+ markdown_text += format_key_issues(value.strip(), key_nice, emoji, gfm_supported)+
Apply this suggestion
Suggestion importance[1-10]: 9
Why: Extracting the complex logic for handling 'key issues to review' into a separate function would significantly improve code readability and maintainability, which is particularly important for this complex section.
9
✅ Define helper functions for improved code clarity and reusabilitySuggestion Impact:The suggestion to define a helper function `is_value_no` was implemented, as evidenced by the use of `is_value_no(value)` in the commit.
code diff:
@@ -173,22 +173,30 @@
markdown_text += f"</td></tr>\n"
elif 'key issues to review' in key_nice.lower():
value = value.strip()
- issues = value.split('\n- ')- for i, _ in enumerate(issues):- issues[i] = issues[i].strip().strip('-').strip()- issues = unique_strings(issues) # remove duplicates- if gfm_supported:- markdown_text += f"<tr><td>"- markdown_text += f"{emoji} <strong>{key_nice}</strong><br><br>\n\n"- else:- markdown_text += f"### {emoji} Key issues to review:\n\n"- for i, issue in enumerate(issues):- if not issue:- continue- issue = emphasize_header(issue, only_markdown=True)- markdown_text += f"{issue}\n\n"- if gfm_supported:- markdown_text += f"</td></tr>\n"+ if is_value_no(value):+ if gfm_supported:+ markdown_text += f"<tr><td>"+ markdown_text += f"{emoji} <strong>No key issues to review</strong>"+ markdown_text += f"</td></tr>\n"+ else:+ markdown_text += f"### {emoji} No key issues to review\n\n"+ else:+ issues = value.split('\n- ')+ for i, _ in enumerate(issues):+ issues[i] = issues[i].strip().strip('-').strip()+ issues = unique_strings(issues) # remove duplicates+ if gfm_supported:+ markdown_text += f"<tr><td>"+ markdown_text += f"{emoji} <strong>{key_nice}</strong><br><br>\n\n"+ else:+ markdown_text += f"### {emoji} Key issues to review:\n\n"+ for i, issue in enumerate(issues):+ if not issue:+ continue+ issue = emphasize_header(issue, only_markdown=True)+ markdown_text += f"{issue}\n\n"+ if gfm_supported:+ markdown_text += f"</td></tr>\n"
The is_value_no function is used but not defined in the visible code. Consider adding a helper function to check if a value is equivalent to "no" to improve code readability and maintainability.
+def is_value_no(value):+ return value.lower().strip() in ['no', 'none', 'n/a', 'false']+
if is_value_no(value):
Apply this suggestion
Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8
Why: The suggestion to define an is_value_no function is valuable for code clarity and reusability, especially since this function is used in the new code but not defined in the visible part.
8
Best practice
Use environment variables for configuration values instead of hardcoding them
Consider using constants or environment variables for the threshold values instead of hardcoding them. This would make it easier to adjust these values in the future without modifying the code directly.
Why: Using environment variables for configuration values is a good practice for flexibility, but the current change is a simple constant update which may not require this level of complexity.
7
Possible issue
Verify the correct implementation of utility functions used in the code
The emphasize_header function is called with only_markdown=True, but this parameter is not visible in the provided code. Ensure that this function is defined correctly and handles this parameter appropriately.
issue = emphasize_header(issue, only_markdown=True)
+# Ensure that emphasize_header is defined as:+# def emphasize_header(text: str, only_markdown: bool = False) -> str:+# # Implementation here
Apply this suggestion
Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6
Why: While it's important to ensure utility functions are correctly implemented, the emphasize_header function is likely defined elsewhere in the codebase. This suggestion is helpful but not critical for the current changes.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
PR Type
enhancement
Description
OUTPUT_BUFFER_TOKENS_SOFT_THRESHOLD
from 1000 to 1500 to allow more tokens in the output buffer before soft limiting.OUTPUT_BUFFER_TOKENS_HARD_THRESHOLD
from 600 to 1000 to allow more tokens in the output buffer before hard limiting.Changes walkthrough 📝
pr_processing.py
Increase token buffer thresholds for output processing
pr_agent/algo/pr_processing.py
OUTPUT_BUFFER_TOKENS_SOFT_THRESHOLD
from 1000 to 1500.OUTPUT_BUFFER_TOKENS_HARD_THRESHOLD
from 600 to 1000.