Fix checking obfuscated value instead of key name on generating cpp file for secrets

[cagdasfil]

Closes #13

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Bug Fixes
  • Updated secret key identification logic in the secrets vault task
  • Improved logging messages for better clarity and tracking

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The changes in the KeepSecretsTask.kt file modify the logic for handling secret keys in the secrets vault plugin. The primary modification involves changing how the task checks for existing keys in the C++ code. Instead of comparing obfuscated values, the new implementation now uses the key name derived from a prefix and the secret's index to determine if a key has already been added.

Changes

File	Change Summary
secretsvaultplugin/src/main/kotlin/com/commencis/secretsvaultplugin/KeepSecretsTask.kt	Modified key checking logic in keepSecrets method to use key names instead of obfuscated values

Assessment against linked issues

Objective	Addressed	Explanation
Fix key duplication issue [#13]	✅

Poem

🐰 A rabbit's tale of secrets untold,
Where keys now dance, no longer controlled
By values that once seemed the same
Now each key sings its unique refrain
In C++ code, diversity reigns! 🔑✨

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)

secretsvaultplugin/src/main/kotlin/com/commencis/secretsvaultplugin/KeepSecretsTask.kt (1)

491-491: Ensure consistent naming and clarity for 'keyName'.
Using the keyName variable to store a combination of the prefix and index is correct, but consider adding context to the variable name (e.g., indexedKeyName) for clarity.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0c044d7 and 078f816.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• secretsvaultplugin/src/main/kotlin/com/commencis/secretsvaultplugin/KeepSecretsTask.kt (1 hunks)

🔇 Additional comments (2)

secretsvaultplugin/src/main/kotlin/com/commencis/secretsvaultplugin/KeepSecretsTask.kt (2)

492-495: Verify potential partial-duplication handling for secrets.
This early return prevents the addition of any further secrets if a partial or duplicate key is encountered. Confirm that this behavior is intentional and does not skip valid secrets in the same pass.

Would you like me to generate a script to search the codebase for instances where partial duplicates might manifest or be handled differently?

---

499-499: Code usage of keyName aligns with the PR objective.
By passing the keyName (rather than the obfuscated value) to the C++ code, this change supports the stated goal: “Fix checking obfuscated value instead of key name on generating cpp file for secrets.” The logic here is consistent with the desired fix.