Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🧹 remove downstream-specific Dockerfile #545

Merged

Conversation

rhmdnd
Copy link

@rhmdnd rhmdnd commented Jul 15, 2024

We maintain three different Dockerfiles for similar purposes. One for CI
called Dockerfile.ci, another for downstream builds called
Dockerfile.ocp, and another in build/Dockerfile.

The downstream Dockerfile isn't used anywhere, so let's remove it so we
have less places to update golang versions.

@rhmdnd
Copy link
Author

rhmdnd commented Jul 15, 2024

Hold until we get good testing signal.

Copy link

🤖 To deploy this PR, run the following command:

make catalog-deploy CATALOG_IMG=ghcr.io/complianceascode/compliance-operator-catalog:545

@Vincent056
Copy link

/retest

@Vincent056
Copy link

rosa failures looks unrelated

/lgtm

@rhmdnd
Copy link
Author

rhmdnd commented Jul 16, 2024

/test e2e-rosa

failed to provision the rosa cluster - unrelated to this change.

@rhmdnd
Copy link
Author

rhmdnd commented Jul 16, 2024

/test e2e-rosa

Another unrelated failure due to the rosa cluster failing to install.

@rhmdnd rhmdnd requested a review from xiaojiey July 16, 2024 21:16
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm label Jul 22, 2024
@rhmdnd
Copy link
Author

rhmdnd commented Jul 22, 2024

Fixed up the remove conflict. @Vincent056 @yuumasato should be ready for another look.

Copy link

🤖 To deploy this PR, run the following command:

make catalog-deploy CATALOG_IMG=ghcr.io/complianceascode/compliance-operator-catalog:545

@rhmdnd
Copy link
Author

rhmdnd commented Jul 22, 2024

/test images

Image registry threw a 500...

@rhmdnd
Copy link
Author

rhmdnd commented Jul 24, 2024

Applying px, doc, and qe labels since this isn't used anywhere in our upstream build process and shouldn't require any documentation changes.

Copy link
Member

@yuumasato yuumasato left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 25, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: rhmdnd, yuumasato

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@yuumasato
Copy link
Member

/retest-required

@rhmdnd
Copy link
Author

rhmdnd commented Jul 26, 2024

Tests here are going to fail until we get #523 landed.

We maintain three different Dockerfiles for similar purposes. One for CI
called `Dockerfile.ci`, another for downstream builds called
`Dockerfile.ocp`, and another in build/Dockerfile.

The downstream Dockerfile isn't used anywhere, so let's remove it so we
have less places to update golang versions.
Copy link

🤖 To deploy this PR, run the following command:

make catalog-deploy CATALOG_IMG=ghcr.io/complianceascode/compliance-operator-catalog:545

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit 4c90446 into ComplianceAsCode:master Jul 30, 2024
14 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants