Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: actions tags filter #73

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
May 31, 2024
Merged

fix: actions tags filter #73

merged 6 commits into from
May 31, 2024

Conversation

utkarsh-dixit
Copy link
Collaborator

@utkarsh-dixit utkarsh-dixit commented May 31, 2024

🚀 This description was created by Ellipsis for commit 9b241d5

Summary:

This PR enhances the conditional filtering in Actions.get and reorganizes enums for improved clarity, including the introduction of a new variable and a minor update in list conversion for app filtering.

Key points:

  • Adds and modifies conditional filtering for 'important' tag in Actions.get when items >= 15 in composio/client/__init__.py.
  • Introduced should_not_filter_using_tags variable for clarity.
  • Extensively updates and reorganizes entries in composio/client/enums.py.
  • Modified list conversion in composio/cli/apps.py to ensure uniqueness when filtering.

Generated with ❤️ by ellipsis.dev

Copy link
Contributor

@ellipsis-dev ellipsis-dev bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 Looks good to me! Reviewed everything up to abdd534 in 2 minutes and 55 seconds

More details
  • Looked at 8753 lines of code in 2 files
  • Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
  • Skipped posting 1 drafted comments based on config settings.
1. composio/client/__init__.py:708
  • Draft comment:
    The conditional logic here is too specific and could lead to unexpected behavior if not all conditions are met exactly. Consider a more general approach to filtering that does not depend on the number of items or specific tag names directly in the condition.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Confidence of 0% on close inspection, compared to threshold of 50%.

Workflow ID: wflow_nheS9G1B0BZsUn4u


You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

6 days left in your free trial, upgrade for $20/seat/month or contact us.

for item in items
if any(tag in required_triggers for tag in item.tags)
]
if (not len(items) < 15 and len(required_triggers) == 1 and required_triggers[0] == "important"):
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

if len(items) >= 15 and len(required_triggers) == 1 and required_triggers[0] == "important":

Copy link
Contributor

@ellipsis-dev ellipsis-dev bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on 00f31eb in 3 minutes and 6 seconds

More details
  • Looked at 22 lines of code in 1 files
  • Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
  • Skipped posting 1 drafted comments based on config settings.
1. composio/client/__init__.py:709
  • Draft comment:
    The condition not len(items) < 15 is equivalent to len(items) >= 15, which might not be the intended logic for filtering by the 'important' tag. Typically, such conditions are used to limit operations when the dataset is too large. Please confirm if this is the intended behavior or if it should be adjusted.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Confidence of 0% on close inspection, compared to threshold of 50%.

Workflow ID: wflow_n9wSR0NYY7dVTOdz


You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

6 days left in your free trial, upgrade for $20/seat/month or contact us.

Copy link
Contributor

@ellipsis-dev ellipsis-dev bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

❌ Changes requested. Incremental review on 29db0ac in 2 minutes and 19 seconds

More details
  • Looked at 13 lines of code in 1 files
  • Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
  • Skipped posting 0 drafted comments based on config settings.

Workflow ID: wflow_o5I0h5gZvgrtWwI9


Want Ellipsis to fix these issues? Tag @ellipsis-dev in a comment. You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

6 days left in your free trial, upgrade for $20/seat/month or contact us.

for item in items
if any(tag in required_triggers for tag in item.tags)
]
if not (len(items) < 15 and len(required_tags) == 1 and required_tags[0] == "important"):
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The modified logical condition seems incorrect. It negates the entire expression, which changes the intended behavior of applying the 'important' tag filter. The correct condition should apply the filter only when there are 15 or more items and the 'important' tag is specified.

Suggested change
if not (len(items) < 15 and len(required_tags) == 1 and required_tags[0] == "important"):
if len(items) >= 15 and len(required_tags) == 1 and required_tags[0] == 'important':

Copy link
Contributor

@shubhras01 shubhras01 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

Copy link
Contributor

@ellipsis-dev ellipsis-dev bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

❌ Changes requested. Incremental review on 9c374e9 in 5 minutes and 2 seconds

More details
  • Looked at 14 lines of code in 1 files
  • Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
  • Skipped posting 0 drafted comments based on config settings.

Workflow ID: wflow_9jyqFmrA6HVrnLOb


Want Ellipsis to fix these issues? Tag @ellipsis-dev in a comment. You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

6 days left in your free trial, upgrade for $20/seat/month or contact us.

for item in items
if any(tag in required_triggers for tag in item.tags)
]
should_not_filter_using_tags = len(items) < 15 and len(required_tags) == 1 and required_tags[0] == "important"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The logic for filtering items based on the 'important' tag seems to be inverted. The condition should_not_filter_using_tags is set to True when the number of items is less than 15, there is only one tag, and that tag is 'important'. However, the subsequent if not should_not_filter_using_tags: suggests that filtering should occur when it should not. Please verify the intended behavior and adjust the logic accordingly.

Suggested change
should_not_filter_using_tags = len(items) < 15 and len(required_tags) == 1 and required_tags[0] == "important"
should_not_filter_using_tags = len(items) >= 15 or len(required_tags) != 1 or required_tags[0] != "important"

Copy link
Contributor

@ellipsis-dev ellipsis-dev bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on 9b241d5 in 2 minutes and 50 seconds

More details
  • Looked at 14 lines of code in 1 files
  • Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
  • Skipped posting 1 drafted comments based on config settings.
1. composio/cli/apps.py:178
  • Draft comment:
    The PR description does not mention changes related to filtering beta apps in apps.py. Please ensure that the PR description accurately reflects the changes made in the code.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Confidence of 0% on close inspection, compared to threshold of 50%.

Workflow ID: wflow_vvMWXTJZNdCbzDRf


You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

6 days left in your free trial, upgrade for $20/seat/month or contact us.

@shubhras01 shubhras01 merged commit 4be2a41 into master May 31, 2024
2 of 3 checks passed
@angrybayblade angrybayblade deleted the fx-tags-actions-filter branch June 13, 2024 11:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants