PSIA Definition update

[brad-newman]

Addresses Issue #2 ("Person" > "person")

[HazardJ]

Hi, thanks for looking at this, but I think that lowercasing the definition is not the solution. It's unconventional as an approach and inconsistent with the text. Section 1 of the agreement says "Capitalized terms used and ...." If "person" in the text is lowercase, it does not refer to the definition. You could remove the definition. But a better approach would be to capitalize the occurrences of "person" in the text where the term is intended to be used for its defined meaning. It appears that "person" is used for the defined meaning in all 27 occurrences except: in the phrase "third person"; as part of "Company Covered Person" and the following reference to "any person listed ..." in the statute; in the phrase "(in person, by proxy or ...)"; and the parallel phrase "(whether by proxy, in person or by ...)".
I've doing "Prose Objects" for the set of documents and parameterize defined terms, which eliminates any ambiguity. Am interested in your opinion on which uses of "person" are intended to refer to the defined term.