-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 351
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Sub calls and entry point #796
Conversation
f7b7b88
to
1e8294b
Compare
This should be fully implemented based on our discussion on the issue. Happy for any change requests on the actual types sent, but even more on the naming. I think the names are descriptive enough, but feel rather long and awkward to me. ("sub call" is a more common usage than "subcall", so I camel-cased it as |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Very nice. Basically just the renaming we talked about
70468d6
to
84f8fb1
Compare
Rebased, made all requested changes, and rebuilt test contract. Let me know if this is good to merge now? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🚀
Closes #691