-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 411
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add Build Address gRPC Query #1753
Add Build Address gRPC Query #1753
Conversation
Not exactly sure why test-system CI is failing, running make test-system locally passes |
Codecov ReportAttention:
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1753 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 54.89% 54.99% +0.09%
==========================================
Files 64 64
Lines 9640 9663 +23
==========================================
+ Hits 5292 5314 +22
Misses 3822 3822
- Partials 526 527 +1
|
@alpe this is ready for review whenever you get the chance |
@NotJeremyLiu fyi #1748 . |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for taking this task! 💐
There are some changes needed to improve code quality and also it would be great if you could add more test cases such as wrong args, missing args etc..
Overall really nice work! 💯
x/wasm/keeper/querier_test.go
Outdated
|
||
func TestQueryBuildAddress(t *testing.T) { | ||
specs := map[string]struct { | ||
srcQuery *types.QueryBuildAddressRequest |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
srcQuery *types.QueryBuildAddressRequest | |
src *types.QueryBuildAddressRequest |
personal preference, just to keep consistent with all the others
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
done here: e405904
Co-authored-by: pinosu <95283998+pinosu@users.noreply.github.com>
Thank you for reviewing, will address feedback later tonight! |
@NotJeremyLiu thanks for making the changes. Now code looks good. 💯 |
@pinosu Yes I can do that, sorry have been busy with work, will ping you directly once done and ready for re-review! |
Done here: b17c9fb |
all feedback addressed and more unit tests added, ready for re-review @pinosu |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice work! 💯 LGTM 👍
Closes #1705