Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

CASMTRIAGE-3353 Allow <1TiB disks for OS and LUKs #30

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 17, 2022
Merged

CASMTRIAGE-3353 Allow <1TiB disks for OS and LUKs #30

merged 1 commit into from
May 17, 2022

Conversation

rustydb
Copy link
Contributor

@rustydb rustydb commented May 17, 2022

Summary and Scope

Issue Type
  • RFE Pull Request

This allows new plan of record systems with 960GiB drives for OS and LUKs.

Prerequisites

  • I have included documentation in my PR (or it is not required)
  • I tested this on internal system (x) (if yes, please include results or a description of the test)

Idempotency

Risks and Mitigations

What is less risky, or more risky now - or if your mod fails is there a new risk?

@rustydb rustydb requested a review from a team as a code owner May 17, 2022 16:47
@rustydb rustydb mentioned this pull request May 17, 2022
Closed
7 tasks
@rustydb rustydb merged commit 4095183 into main May 17, 2022
@rustydb rustydb deleted the CASMTRIAGE-3353-new-small-disks branch May 17, 2022 17:23
rustydb added a commit that referenced this pull request May 17, 2022
@rustydb
Revert "CASMTRIAGE-3353 Allow <1TiB disks for OS and LUKs (#30)"
a5206a4 
This reverts commit 4095183.
@rustydb rustydb mentioned this pull request May 17, 2022
Merged
rustydb added a commit that referenced this pull request May 17, 2022
@rustydb
Revert "CASMTRIAGE-3353 Allow <1TiB disks for OS and LUKs (#30)" (#31)
cecf0a2 
This reverts commit 4095183.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@jacobsalmela jacobsalmela jacobsalmela approved these changes

@rsjostrand-hpe rsjostrand-hpe Awaiting requested review from rsjostrand-hpe

@cdelatte-hpe cdelatte-hpe Awaiting requested review from cdelatte-hpe

@mismacku mismacku Awaiting requested review from mismacku mismacku is a code owner automatically assigned from Cray-HPE/metal

@manderson-hpe manderson-hpe Awaiting requested review from manderson-hpe manderson-hpe is a code owner automatically assigned from Cray-HPE/metal

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@rustydb @jacobsalmela