fixed syntax error in code block for parameterized_subdag

[sT0v]

Fixed syntax error in code block for parameterized_subdag

How I tested this

Pasted in vscode to validate formatting it correct

Notes

Checklist

• PR has an informative and human-readable title (this will be pulled into the release notes)
• Changes are limited to a single goal (no scope creep)
• Code passed the pre-commit check & code is left cleaner/nicer than when first encountered.
• Any change in functionality is tested
• New functions are documented (with a description, list of inputs, and expected output)
• Placeholder code is flagged / future TODOs are captured in comments
• Project documentation has been updated if adding/changing functionality.

[ellipsis-dev]

👍 Looks good to me! Reviewed everything up to ca0440b in 40 seconds

More details

• Looked at 31 lines of code in 1 files
• Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
• Skipped posting 1 drafted comments based on config settings.

1. hamilton/function_modifiers/recursive.py:505

• Draft comment:
  Missing closing parenthesis in the example code block for parameterized_subdag. Add a closing parenthesis to ensure the example is accurate.

                "inputs" : {"data" : value("datasource_3.csv")},

• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable:
  The comment is about a change made in the diff, specifically the correction of missing closing parentheses. The comment is accurate as it points out an issue that was present in the original code and has been addressed in the changes. The comment is actionable and clear, suggesting a specific correction that aligns with the changes made.
  I might be missing the fact that the issue has already been resolved in the diff, which would make the comment redundant. The comment might not be necessary if the change has already been made.
  The comment is still useful as it confirms that the change made in the diff was necessary and correct. It serves as a validation of the correction made.
  The comment is correct and should be kept as it accurately points out an issue that was addressed in the changes. It confirms the necessity of the change made in the diff.

Workflow ID: wflow_HOLu26TcdxLk95eB

---

You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

[elijahbenizzy]

Thank you @sT0v!