-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
#2309: Update CMake
to look for magistrate
target
#2310
#2309: Update CMake
to look for magistrate
target
#2310
Conversation
Pipelines resultsPR tests (gcc-12, ubuntu, mpich, verbose, kokkos) Build for 7175daa (2024-07-08 23:17:42 UTC)
PR tests (clang-9, ubuntu, mpich) Build for 7175daa (2024-07-08 23:17:42 UTC)
PR tests (clang-13, alpine, mpich) Build for 7175daa (2024-07-08 23:17:42 UTC)
PR tests (gcc-8, ubuntu, mpich, address sanitizer) Build for 7175daa (2024-07-08 23:17:42 UTC)
PR tests (clang-12, ubuntu, mpich) Build for 7175daa (2024-07-08 23:17:42 UTC)
PR tests (clang-11, ubuntu, mpich) Build for 7175daa (2024-07-08 23:17:42 UTC)
PR tests (gcc-10, ubuntu, openmpi, no LB) Build for 7175daa (2024-07-08 23:17:42 UTC)
PR tests (gcc-9, ubuntu, mpich, zoltan, json schema test) Build for 7175daa (2024-07-08 23:17:42 UTC)
PR tests (clang-13, ubuntu, mpich) Build for 7175daa (2024-07-08 23:17:42 UTC)
PR tests (clang-14, ubuntu, mpich, verbose) Build for 7175daa (2024-07-08 23:17:42 UTC)
PR tests (intel icpx, ubuntu, mpich, verbose) Build for 7175daa (2024-07-08 23:17:42 UTC)
PR tests (gcc-11, ubuntu, mpich, trace runtime, coverage) Build for 7175daa (2024-07-08 23:17:42 UTC)
PR tests (intel icpc, ubuntu, mpich) Build for 7175daa (2024-07-08 23:17:42 UTC)
PR tests (clang-10, ubuntu, mpich) Build for 7175daa (2024-07-08 23:17:42 UTC)
PR tests (nvidia cuda 12.2.0, gcc-9, ubuntu, mpich, verbose) Build for 7175daa (2024-07-08 23:17:42 UTC)
PR tests (nvidia cuda 11.2, gcc-9, ubuntu, mpich) Build for 7175daa (2024-07-08 23:17:42 UTC)
|
7696d82
to
c23002c
Compare
c23002c
to
7175daa
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good to me.
Do we need to worry about users relying on vt::lib::checkpoint
?
Fixes #2309