Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Exclude ignored measures in cnetcheck #4784

Merged

Conversation

AustinSanders
Copy link
Contributor

@AustinSanders AustinSanders commented Feb 9, 2022

The 'ignore' flag was previously being used only to exclude ignored points, not ignored measures. This PR addresses this by excluding ignored measures.

Description

Makes use of the "GetValidMeasuresInCube" function to exclude ignored measures when the "ignore" flag is set.

Related Issue

Closes #4649

Motivation and Context

Including ignored measures results in false positives.

How Has This Been Tested?

Wrote a new test that adds an ignored control measure.

Screenshots (if appropriate):

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Documentation change (update to the documentation; no code change)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)

Checklist:

  • I have read and agree to abide by the Code of Conduct
  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING document.
  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.
  • I have added tests to cover my changes.
  • All new and existing tests passed.
  • I have added myself to the .zenodo.json document.
  • I have added any user impacting changes to the CHANGELOG.md document.

Licensing

This project is mostly composed of free and unencumbered software released into the public domain, and we are unlikely to accept contributions that are not also released into the public domain. Somewhere near the top of each file should have these words:

This work is free and unencumbered software released into the public domain. In jurisdictions that recognize copyright laws, the author or authors of this software dedicate any and all copyright interest in the software to the public domain.

  • I dedicate any and all copyright interest in this software to the public domain. I make this dedication for the benefit of the public at large and to the detriment of my heirs and successors. I intend this dedication to be an overt act of relinquishment in perpetuity of all present and future rights to this software under copyright law.

@AustinSanders AustinSanders added the bug Something isn't working label Feb 9, 2022
Comment on lines +639 to +643
if (ignore) {
measures = cnet.GetValidMeasuresInCube(serialNumber);
} else {
measures = cnet.GetMeasuresInCube(serialNumber);
}
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we also ignore the point if all measures are ignored? That is, can all the measures be set to ignored but not the point? If so, in that case also ignore the point automatically? Or does cnetcheck already report points with no measures?

Copy link
Contributor

@jessemapel jessemapel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Test also needs to check for an island that is connected by an ignored point.

m2->SetAprioriLine(999);
m2->SetAprioriSample(999);
m2->SetCamera(cube2->camera());
m2->SetCubeSerialNumber(cube2Serial);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would also set these measures to ignored and look for 0 no-lat/lon cubes. I don't think that the third measure changes the cnetcheck output.

@jessemapel
Copy link
Contributor

Needs a changelog entry

@AustinSanders AustinSanders merged commit 37f9c3d into DOI-USGS:dev Mar 2, 2022
github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 2, 2022
* Modified noLatLon logic to exclude ignored measures

* Added test for ignored measures

* Added entry for cnetcheck ignored points

* Added test for ignored point, fixed test for ignored measures
AustinSanders added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 2, 2022
* Modified noLatLon logic to exclude ignored measures

* Added test for ignored measures

* Added entry for cnetcheck ignored points

* Added test for ignored point, fixed test for ignored measures

Co-authored-by: AustinSanders <austinsanders1993@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

cnetcheck not excluding ignored measures resulting in false positives
3 participants