Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Avoid redownloading all dependencies (protoc, gogo) #337
Avoid redownloading all dependencies (protoc, gogo) #337
Changes from all commits
107b12d
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
May not be something to tackle, but these files are unziped into
/tmp
toplevel dir and if an existing directory matches the name (include
), you won't get a clean state.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ooh good point, fixed as it's a one line thing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should the proto path be toolchain_legacy_include_dir or toolchain_include_dir?
PS: I see a number of these occurrences below too
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's actually supposed to be the legacy include directory. I was suprised too and it took me a bit of digging to discovery this.
If you use the new include directory, then the go types will be subtly different (i.e. use google.golang.org/protobuf/types instead of the deprecated github.com/golang/protobuf/ptypes). This is probably fine, but technically a break that should be tested separately, so I'm keeping the old behavior in this PR