Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Stop using the deprecated linters.errcheck.ignore in the golangci-lint configuration file #28644

Merged
merged 13 commits into from
Aug 23, 2024

Conversation

FlorentClarret
Copy link
Member

@FlorentClarret FlorentClarret commented Aug 22, 2024

What does this PR do?

Stop using the deprecated linters.errcheck.ignore in the golangci-lint configuration file

Motivation

Additional Notes

Possible Drawbacks / Trade-offs

Describe how to test/QA your changes

@FlorentClarret FlorentClarret requested a review from a team as a code owner August 22, 2024 08:32
@FlorentClarret FlorentClarret changed the title Stop using the deprecated linters.errcheck.ignore in the golangci-lint configuration file Stop using the deprecated linters.errcheck.ignore in the golangci-lint configuration file Aug 22, 2024
@FlorentClarret FlorentClarret added changelog/no-changelog qa/no-code-change Skip QA week as there is no code change in Agent code labels Aug 22, 2024
@pr-commenter
Copy link

pr-commenter bot commented Aug 22, 2024

Regression Detector

Regression Detector Results

Run ID: b10fd52a-890e-46ef-9e69-d72150b6b5cc Metrics dashboard Target profiles

Baseline: ec2a4be
Comparison: a36204b

Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:

  • ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
  • ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
  • ➖ = no significant change in performance

No significant changes in experiment optimization goals

Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%

There were no significant changes in experiment optimization goals at this confidence level and effect size tolerance.

Fine details of change detection per experiment

perf experiment goal Δ mean % Δ mean % CI links
basic_py_check % cpu utilization +2.82 [+0.11, +5.54] Logs
otel_to_otel_logs ingress throughput +0.23 [-0.58, +1.04] Logs
uds_dogstatsd_to_api ingress throughput -0.00 [-0.00, +0.00] Logs
tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude ingress throughput -0.00 [-0.01, +0.01] Logs
idle memory utilization -0.14 [-0.18, -0.11] Logs
file_tree memory utilization -0.37 [-0.43, -0.31] Logs
tcp_syslog_to_blackhole ingress throughput -0.49 [-13.21, +12.23] Logs
uds_dogstatsd_to_api_cpu % cpu utilization -0.78 [-1.59, +0.02] Logs
pycheck_lots_of_tags % cpu utilization -1.24 [-3.60, +1.12] Logs

Bounds Checks

perf experiment bounds_check_name replicates_passed
idle memory_usage 10/10

Explanation

A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".

For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:

  1. Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.

  2. Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.

  3. Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".

@FlorentClarret FlorentClarret requested a review from a team as a code owner August 22, 2024 12:45
@FlorentClarret FlorentClarret marked this pull request as draft August 22, 2024 13:45
@pr-commenter
Copy link

pr-commenter bot commented Aug 22, 2024

Test changes on VM

Use this command from test-infra-definitions to manually test this PR changes on a VM:

inv create-vm --pipeline-id=42604128 --os-family=ubuntu

Note: This applies to commit a36204b

@FlorentClarret FlorentClarret marked this pull request as ready for review August 23, 2024 05:13
@FlorentClarret
Copy link
Member Author

/merge

@dd-devflow
Copy link

dd-devflow bot commented Aug 23, 2024

🚂 MergeQueue: pull request added to the queue

The median merge time in main is 22m.

Use /merge -c to cancel this operation!

@dd-mergequeue dd-mergequeue bot merged commit b6e2627 into main Aug 23, 2024
219 checks passed
@dd-mergequeue dd-mergequeue bot deleted the florentclarret/golangci-lint-warnings branch August 23, 2024 09:07
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the 7.58.0 milestone Aug 23, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
changelog/no-changelog qa/no-code-change Skip QA week as there is no code change in Agent code team/agent-devx-loops
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants