Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[new-e2e] Check empty instance reservations condition for dumpKindClusterState #32571

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jan 7, 2025

Conversation

fanny-jiang
Copy link
Contributor

@fanny-jiang fanny-jiang commented Dec 31, 2024

What does this PR do?

Fixes a panic/index out of range error in AWS kind provisioner's dumpKindClusterState function that occurs when instancesDescription is not nil but instancesDescription.Reservations = [].

Print statements while debugging:

INSTANCES DESCRIPTION:  &{<nil> [] {map[{}:-718501000 {}:0x140001b47f8 {}:088289ef-7e83-415d-9120-49e8ab06b72e {}:{13967045742491301000 44903162001 0x112b22d60} {}:{0 63871199208 <nil>} {}:{[{<nil> false false {map[{}:-718501000 {}:0x140001b47f8 {}:088289ef-7e83-415d-9120-49e8ab06b72e {}:{13967045742491301000 44903162001 0x112b22d60} {}:{0 63871199208 <nil>}]}}]}]} {}}
INSTANCES DESCRIPTION.RESERVATIONS:  []
=== NAME  TestAWSKindSuite
    panic.go:115: test panicked: runtime error: index out of range [0] with length 0

Motivation

bugfix

Describe how you validated your changes

Possible Drawbacks / Trade-offs

Additional Notes

@github-actions github-actions bot added team/agent-devx-loops short review PR is simple enough to be reviewed quickly labels Dec 31, 2024
@fanny-jiang fanny-jiang changed the title Check empty instancesDescription.Reservations condition [new-e2e/awsk8s provisioner] Check empty instancesDescription.Reservations condition Dec 31, 2024
@fanny-jiang fanny-jiang added qa/no-code-change No code change in Agent code requiring validation changelog/no-changelog labels Dec 31, 2024
@fanny-jiang fanny-jiang changed the title [new-e2e/awsk8s provisioner] Check empty instancesDescription.Reservations condition [new-e2e] Check empty instance reservations condition for dumpKindClusterState Dec 31, 2024
@agent-platform-auto-pr
Copy link
Contributor

agent-platform-auto-pr bot commented Dec 31, 2024

[Fast Unit Tests Report]

On pipeline 52349568 (CI Visibility). The following jobs did not run any unit tests:

Jobs:
  • tests_deb-arm64-py3
  • tests_deb-x64-py3
  • tests_flavor_dogstatsd_deb-x64
  • tests_flavor_heroku_deb-x64
  • tests_flavor_iot_deb-x64
  • tests_rpm-arm64-py3
  • tests_rpm-x64-py3
  • tests_windows-x64

If you modified Go files and expected unit tests to run in these jobs, please double check the job logs. If you think tests should have been executed reach out to #agent-devx-help

@agent-platform-auto-pr
Copy link
Contributor

agent-platform-auto-pr bot commented Dec 31, 2024

Uncompressed package size comparison

Comparison with ancestor 2c0aedb5c5a457aafcd802d953979746b63c05db

Diff per package
package diff status size ancestor threshold
datadog-agent-amd64-deb 0.00MB 1011.42MB 1011.42MB 140.00MB
datadog-agent-x86_64-rpm 0.00MB 1020.73MB 1020.73MB 140.00MB
datadog-agent-x86_64-suse 0.00MB 1020.73MB 1020.73MB 140.00MB
datadog-agent-arm64-deb 0.00MB 940.77MB 940.77MB 140.00MB
datadog-agent-aarch64-rpm 0.00MB 950.07MB 950.07MB 140.00MB
datadog-dogstatsd-amd64-deb 0.00MB 58.62MB 58.62MB 10.00MB
datadog-dogstatsd-x86_64-rpm 0.00MB 58.70MB 58.70MB 10.00MB
datadog-dogstatsd-x86_64-suse 0.00MB 58.70MB 58.70MB 10.00MB
datadog-dogstatsd-arm64-deb 0.00MB 56.13MB 56.13MB 10.00MB
datadog-heroku-agent-amd64-deb 0.00MB 506.15MB 506.15MB 70.00MB
datadog-iot-agent-amd64-deb 0.00MB 113.80MB 113.80MB 10.00MB
datadog-iot-agent-x86_64-rpm 0.00MB 113.87MB 113.87MB 10.00MB
datadog-iot-agent-x86_64-suse 0.00MB 113.87MB 113.87MB 10.00MB
datadog-iot-agent-arm64-deb 0.00MB 109.25MB 109.25MB 10.00MB
datadog-iot-agent-aarch64-rpm 0.00MB 109.32MB 109.32MB 10.00MB

Decision

✅ Passed

@agent-platform-auto-pr
Copy link
Contributor

agent-platform-auto-pr bot commented Dec 31, 2024

Test changes on VM

Use this command from test-infra-definitions to manually test this PR changes on a VM:

inv aws.create-vm --pipeline-id=52349568 --os-family=ubuntu

Note: This applies to commit 6e36305

Copy link

cit-pr-commenter bot commented Dec 31, 2024

Regression Detector

Regression Detector Results

Metrics dashboard
Target profiles
Run ID: 347a5924-166f-44b3-a9a9-f88e3dac7230

Baseline: 2c0aedb
Comparison: 6e36305
Diff

Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected

Fine details of change detection per experiment

perf experiment goal Δ mean % Δ mean % CI trials links
file_tree memory utilization +0.27 [+0.13, +0.40] 1 Logs
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory utilization +0.24 [+0.15, +0.33] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency egress throughput +0.19 [-0.58, +0.95] 1 Logs
quality_gate_idle memory utilization +0.13 [+0.09, +0.17] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 egress throughput +0.09 [-0.79, +0.98] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 egress throughput +0.08 [-0.76, +0.93] 1 Logs
tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude ingress throughput -0.00 [-0.01, +0.01] 1 Logs
uds_dogstatsd_to_api ingress throughput -0.01 [-0.13, +0.11] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency egress throughput -0.01 [-0.80, +0.78] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency egress throughput -0.02 [-0.94, +0.90] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency egress throughput -0.02 [-0.66, +0.62] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency egress throughput -0.05 [-0.74, +0.63] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load egress throughput -0.13 [-0.60, +0.33] 1 Logs
uds_dogstatsd_to_api_cpu % cpu utilization -0.58 [-1.25, +0.10] 1 Logs
tcp_syslog_to_blackhole ingress throughput -1.68 [-1.75, -1.60] 1 Logs
quality_gate_logs % cpu utilization -2.33 [-5.52, +0.85] 1 Logs

Bounds Checks: ✅ Passed

perf experiment bounds_check_name replicates_passed links
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
quality_gate_idle memory_usage 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory_usage 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs lost_bytes 10/10
quality_gate_logs memory_usage 10/10

Explanation

Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%

Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:

  • ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
  • ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
  • ➖ = no significant change in performance

A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".

For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:

  1. Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.

  2. Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.

  3. Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".

CI Pass/Fail Decision

Passed. All Quality Gates passed.

  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check lost_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.

@fanny-jiang fanny-jiang marked this pull request as ready for review December 31, 2024 16:13
@fanny-jiang fanny-jiang requested review from a team as code owners December 31, 2024 16:13
@fanny-jiang
Copy link
Contributor Author

/merge

@dd-devflow
Copy link

dd-devflow bot commented Jan 7, 2025

Devflow running: /merge

View all feedbacks in Devflow UI.


2025-01-07 16:19:53 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: waiting for PR to be ready

This merge request is not mergeable yet, because of pending checks/missing approvals. It will be added to the queue as soon as checks pass and/or get approvals.
Note: if you pushed new commits since the last approval, you may need additional approval.
You can remove it from the waiting list with /remove command.


2025-01-07 17:30:02 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: merge request added to the queue

The median merge time in main is 36m.


2025-01-07 18:10:58 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: This merge request was merged

@dd-mergequeue dd-mergequeue bot merged commit 84f907c into main Jan 7, 2025
308 checks passed
@dd-mergequeue dd-mergequeue bot deleted the fanny/k8s-dump-bugfix branch January 7, 2025 18:10
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the 7.63.0 milestone Jan 7, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
changelog/no-changelog qa/no-code-change No code change in Agent code requiring validation short review PR is simple enough to be reviewed quickly team/agent-devx-loops
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants