-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Ruby versions for CI visibility #8
Conversation
07f1038
to
145b324
Compare
@@ -236,6 +141,7 @@ volumes: | |||
bundle-3.0: | |||
bundle-3.1: | |||
bundle-3.2: | |||
bundle-3.3: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Some volumes for old rubies could be gone as well.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yes, thank you
docker-compose.yml
Outdated
@@ -236,6 +141,7 @@ volumes: | |||
bundle-3.0: | |||
bundle-3.1: | |||
bundle-3.2: | |||
bundle-3.3: | |||
# ADD NEW RUBIES HERE | |||
bundle-jruby-9.2: | |||
bundle-jruby-9.3: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Probably worth checking those jrubies.
I think jruby-9.2.21.0 -> ruby 2.5.x, jruby-9.3.9.0 -> ruby 2.6.x and jruby:9.4.0.0 -> ruby 2.7.x.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yes, jruby 9.4 is ruby 2.7+, so I guess I would need to replace 9.3 with 9.4 here
.standard_todo.yml
Outdated
@@ -2,14 +2,6 @@ | |||
# Remove from this list as you refactor files. | |||
--- | |||
ignore: | |||
- lib/datadog/ci/contrib/minitest/integration.rb: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This could be a bit tricky during the migration. Where user is installing ddtrace
with older rubies where safe operator could be a breaking change.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
true, given that we decided to invert dependency for now I need to keep this to make ddtrace-rb specs pass
Dropped support for rubies older than 2.7 (including jruby 9.2).
Added tests that this gem works with Ruby 3.3 (rc).