Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove warning about non-serializable test data #6102

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 1, 2024

Conversation

bouwkast
Copy link
Contributor

@bouwkast bouwkast commented Sep 30, 2024

Summary of changes

Removes warnings about non-serializable test data

Datadog.Trace.Tests: Non-serializable data ('System.Object[]') found for 'Datadog.Trace.Tests.Tagging.ActivityTagsTests.Tags_ShouldBe_PlacedInMetricsOrMeta'; falling back to single test case.

Reason for change

Warnings about Non-serializable data ('System.Object[]').

Implementation details

Ignored them by setting DisableDiscoveryEnumeration = true on MemberData.

Test coverage

Ran tests locally, warning gone.

Other details

Maybe I could've changed them to have serializable test data 🤷

@bouwkast bouwkast requested a review from a team as a code owner September 30, 2024 20:40
@@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ public class SpanMetaStructTests
}
};

[MemberData(nameof(Data))]
[MemberData(nameof(Data), DisableDiscoveryEnumeration = true)]
Copy link
Member

@lucaspimentel lucaspimentel Sep 30, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Don't we want to fix the underlying issue instead of disabling the warning? The warning says "falling back to single test case" which makes me think it will only run one tests case instead of all of them.

See #5089

Copy link
Contributor Author

@bouwkast bouwkast Sep 30, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I mean, maybe? But I think they are useless warnings.

which makes me thing it will only run on tests case instead of all of them.

I don't think so, the tests all run locally on the CLI and via the VS Test Explorer.

What is happening is that xunit (I think or maybe the test host) is attempting to enumerate all of the individual theory data lines just so that you could run an individual Theory data by itself instead of the entire test.

That is what the Non-serializable data ('System.Object[]') found for 'Datadog.Trace.Tests.Tagging.ActivityTagsTests.Tags_ShouldBe_PlacedInMetricsOrMeta'; falling back to single test case. is ultimately meaning.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I didn't see that we have been fixing them to be serializable previously

But I'll swap to fix it to be consistent.

I am curious if that enumeration is slowing our tests down 🤔

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You're right it still runs all the cases at run time, so meh. Thanks for looking into this!

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, the analysis is 100 correct, it just gives a worse local dev experience, I only learned that after raising an issue for it here 😄 xunit/xunit#2866

I am curious if that enumeration is slowing our tests down

My strong suspicion is that it's a drop in the ocean and not worth worrying about 😃

@datadog-ddstaging
Copy link

datadog-ddstaging bot commented Sep 30, 2024

Datadog Report

Branch report: steven/non-serial-xunit
Commit report: 9e66e52
Test service: dd-trace-dotnet

✅ 0 Failed, 362359 Passed, 2069 Skipped, 15h 57m 50.01s Total Time

@lucaspimentel lucaspimentel requested review from a team and andrewlock September 30, 2024 21:08
@andrewlock
Copy link
Member

Execution-Time Benchmarks Report ⏱️

Execution-time results for samples comparing the following branches/commits:

Execution-time benchmarks measure the whole time it takes to execute a program. And are intended to measure the one-off costs. Cases where the execution time results for the PR are worse than latest master results are shown in red. The following thresholds were used for comparing the execution times:

  • Welch test with statistical test for significance of 5%
  • Only results indicating a difference greater than 5% and 5 ms are considered.

Note that these results are based on a single point-in-time result for each branch. For full results, see the dashboard.

Graphs show the p99 interval based on the mean and StdDev of the test run, as well as the mean value of the run (shown as a diamond below the graph).

gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET Framework 4.6.2) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (6102) - mean (70ms)  : 68, 73
     .   : milestone, 70,
    master - mean (71ms)  : 68, 73
     .   : milestone, 71,

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (6102) - mean (1,107ms)  : 1087, 1128
     .   : milestone, 1107,
    master - mean (1,103ms)  : 1076, 1131
     .   : milestone, 1103,

Loading
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET Core 3.1) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (6102) - mean (110ms)  : 107, 114
     .   : milestone, 110,
    master - mean (110ms)  : 105, 115
     .   : milestone, 110,

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (6102) - mean (768ms)  : 754, 782
     .   : milestone, 768,
    master - mean (772ms)  : 757, 787
     .   : milestone, 772,

Loading
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET 6) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (6102) - mean (93ms)  : 90, 96
     .   : milestone, 93,
    master - mean (93ms)  : 90, 95
     .   : milestone, 93,

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (6102) - mean (731ms)  : 710, 753
     .   : milestone, 731,
    master - mean (727ms)  : 711, 744
     .   : milestone, 727,

Loading
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET Framework 4.6.2) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (6102) - mean (190ms)  : 187, 193
     .   : milestone, 190,
    master - mean (190ms)  : 187, 193
     .   : milestone, 190,

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (6102) - mean (1,203ms)  : 1172, 1235
     .   : milestone, 1203,
    master - mean (1,197ms)  : 1171, 1224
     .   : milestone, 1197,

Loading
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET Core 3.1) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (6102) - mean (276ms)  : 272, 281
     .   : milestone, 276,
    master - mean (277ms)  : 273, 281
     .   : milestone, 277,

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (6102) - mean (944ms)  : 920, 969
     .   : milestone, 944,
    master - mean (938ms)  : 918, 958
     .   : milestone, 938,

Loading
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET 6) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (6102) - mean (265ms)  : 261, 269
     .   : milestone, 265,
    master - mean (265ms)  : 260, 270
     .   : milestone, 265,

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (6102) - mean (925ms)  : 909, 941
     .   : milestone, 925,
    master - mean (927ms)  : 906, 949
     .   : milestone, 927,

Loading

@lucaspimentel lucaspimentel requested review from a team and removed request for andrewlock September 30, 2024 21:22
@andrewlock
Copy link
Member

Benchmarks Report for tracer 🐌

Benchmarks for #6102 compared to master:

  • 1 benchmarks are faster, with geometric mean 1.234
  • 1 benchmarks are slower, with geometric mean 1.161
  • 1 benchmarks have fewer allocations

The following thresholds were used for comparing the benchmark speeds:

  • Mann–Whitney U test with statistical test for significance of 5%
  • Only results indicating a difference greater than 10% and 0.3 ns are considered.

Allocation changes below 0.5% are ignored.

Benchmark details

Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master StartStopWithChild net6.0 7.66μs 42.4ns 268ns 0.0151 0.00757 0 5.43 KB
master StartStopWithChild netcoreapp3.1 9.87μs 55ns 335ns 0.0189 0.00947 0 5.61 KB
master StartStopWithChild net472 16.3μs 60.7ns 235ns 1.04 0.324 0.103 6.06 KB
#6102 StartStopWithChild net6.0 7.71μs 42.3ns 243ns 0.0193 0.00772 0 5.43 KB
#6102 StartStopWithChild netcoreapp3.1 9.93μs 54.6ns 345ns 0.0238 0.00953 0 5.61 KB
#6102 StartStopWithChild net472 16.2μs 49.1ns 190ns 0.999 0.282 0.0805 6.07 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0 479μs 266ns 996ns 0 0 0 2.7 KB
master WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1 641μs 312ns 1.17μs 0 0 0 2.7 KB
master WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472 836μs 443ns 1.71μs 0.419 0 0 3.3 KB
#6102 WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0 517μs 436ns 1.57μs 0 0 0 2.7 KB
#6102 WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1 634μs 501ns 1.94μs 0 0 0 2.7 KB
#6102 WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472 834μs 457ns 1.77μs 0.411 0 0 3.3 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master SendRequest net6.0 191μs 1.05μs 6.12μs 0.199 0 0 18.45 KB
master SendRequest netcoreapp3.1 212μs 894ns 3.46μs 0.211 0 0 20.61 KB
master SendRequest net472 0.000501ns 0.000304ns 0.00114ns 0 0 0 0 b
#6102 SendRequest net6.0 192μs 1.09μs 8.6μs 0.203 0 0 18.45 KB
#6102 SendRequest netcoreapp3.1 220μs 1.2μs 7.38μs 0.22 0 0 20.61 KB
#6102 SendRequest net472 0.00191ns 0.000775ns 0.0029ns 0 0 0 0 b
Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Fewer allocations 🎉

Fewer allocations 🎉 in #6102

Benchmark Base Allocated Diff Allocated Change Change %
Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces‑net6.0 41.85 KB 41.54 KB -305 B -0.73%

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0 596μs 3.27μs 20.2μs 0.576 0 0 41.85 KB
master WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1 667μs 2.67μs 9.98μs 0.329 0 0 41.71 KB
master WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472 875μs 2.56μs 9.9μs 8.36 2.64 0.44 53.27 KB
#6102 WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0 559μs 2.34μs 10.4μs 0.551 0 0 41.54 KB
#6102 WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1 679μs 3.42μs 17.5μs 0.331 0 0 41.92 KB
#6102 WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472 856μs 3.97μs 15.9μs 8.28 2.48 0.414 53.3 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.DbCommandBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master ExecuteNonQuery net6.0 1.29μs 1.32ns 5.12ns 0.0142 0 0 1.02 KB
master ExecuteNonQuery netcoreapp3.1 1.75μs 2.4ns 9.31ns 0.014 0 0 1.02 KB
master ExecuteNonQuery net472 2.11μs 2.74ns 10.6ns 0.157 0 0 987 B
#6102 ExecuteNonQuery net6.0 1.31μs 1.11ns 4.29ns 0.0145 0 0 1.02 KB
#6102 ExecuteNonQuery netcoreapp3.1 1.84μs 4.47ns 17.3ns 0.0136 0 0 1.02 KB
#6102 ExecuteNonQuery net472 2.04μs 2.71ns 10.5ns 0.156 0 0 987 B
Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master CallElasticsearch net6.0 1.25μs 0.413ns 1.6ns 0.0138 0 0 976 B
master CallElasticsearch netcoreapp3.1 1.49μs 0.919ns 3.31ns 0.0135 0 0 976 B
master CallElasticsearch net472 2.52μs 1.33ns 5.13ns 0.158 0 0 995 B
master CallElasticsearchAsync net6.0 1.26μs 1.29ns 4.83ns 0.0132 0 0 952 B
master CallElasticsearchAsync netcoreapp3.1 1.59μs 0.468ns 1.81ns 0.0135 0 0 1.02 KB
master CallElasticsearchAsync net472 2.58μs 1.12ns 4.18ns 0.167 0 0 1.05 KB
#6102 CallElasticsearch net6.0 1.25μs 1.37ns 5.29ns 0.0137 0 0 976 B
#6102 CallElasticsearch netcoreapp3.1 1.59μs 0.716ns 2.77ns 0.0134 0 0 976 B
#6102 CallElasticsearch net472 2.56μs 1.1ns 4.26ns 0.157 0 0 995 B
#6102 CallElasticsearchAsync net6.0 1.3μs 0.705ns 2.73ns 0.0136 0 0 952 B
#6102 CallElasticsearchAsync netcoreapp3.1 1.62μs 1.21ns 4.68ns 0.0138 0 0 1.02 KB
#6102 CallElasticsearchAsync net472 2.57μs 1.77ns 6.84ns 0.167 0 0 1.05 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master ExecuteAsync net6.0 1.34μs 0.895ns 3.47ns 0.0133 0 0 952 B
master ExecuteAsync netcoreapp3.1 1.67μs 0.819ns 3.07ns 0.0129 0 0 952 B
master ExecuteAsync net472 1.82μs 0.806ns 3.12ns 0.145 0 0 915 B
#6102 ExecuteAsync net6.0 1.26μs 0.965ns 3.61ns 0.0132 0 0 952 B
#6102 ExecuteAsync netcoreapp3.1 1.71μs 0.932ns 3.49ns 0.0128 0 0 952 B
#6102 ExecuteAsync net472 1.76μs 0.714ns 2.57ns 0.145 0 0 915 B
Benchmarks.Trace.HttpClientBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master SendAsync net6.0 4.14μs 1.7ns 6.37ns 0.031 0 0 2.22 KB
master SendAsync netcoreapp3.1 5.02μs 1.82ns 6.55ns 0.0377 0 0 2.76 KB
master SendAsync net472 7.84μs 1.61ns 6.23ns 0.497 0 0 3.15 KB
#6102 SendAsync net6.0 4.21μs 1.59ns 6.18ns 0.0296 0 0 2.22 KB
#6102 SendAsync netcoreapp3.1 4.9μs 2.4ns 8.65ns 0.0343 0 0 2.76 KB
#6102 SendAsync net472 7.77μs 1.8ns 6.75ns 0.499 0 0 3.15 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master EnrichedLog net6.0 1.47μs 0.657ns 2.46ns 0.0228 0 0 1.64 KB
master EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1 2.21μs 1.71ns 6.62ns 0.0224 0 0 1.64 KB
master EnrichedLog net472 2.5μs 1.02ns 3.81ns 0.249 0 0 1.57 KB
#6102 EnrichedLog net6.0 1.44μs 0.582ns 2.18ns 0.0233 0 0 1.64 KB
#6102 EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1 2.23μs 0.914ns 3.42ns 0.0219 0 0 1.64 KB
#6102 EnrichedLog net472 2.54μs 1.46ns 5.27ns 0.249 0 0 1.57 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master EnrichedLog net6.0 114μs 176ns 680ns 0.0574 0 0 4.28 KB
master EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1 118μs 176ns 659ns 0.0588 0 0 4.28 KB
master EnrichedLog net472 148μs 153ns 592ns 0.663 0.221 0 4.46 KB
#6102 EnrichedLog net6.0 116μs 174ns 673ns 0.0569 0 0 4.28 KB
#6102 EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1 119μs 103ns 398ns 0 0 0 4.28 KB
#6102 EnrichedLog net472 147μs 87.7ns 328ns 0.657 0.219 0 4.46 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.NLogBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master EnrichedLog net6.0 2.99μs 9.04ns 35ns 0.0306 0 0 2.2 KB
master EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1 4.12μs 4.41ns 17.1ns 0.029 0 0 2.2 KB
master EnrichedLog net472 4.97μs 1.94ns 7.5ns 0.321 0 0 2.02 KB
#6102 EnrichedLog net6.0 3.1μs 1.05ns 4.05ns 0.0312 0 0 2.2 KB
#6102 EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1 4.18μs 2.09ns 8.1ns 0.0293 0 0 2.2 KB
#6102 EnrichedLog net472 4.8μs 0.912ns 3.41ns 0.32 0 0 2.02 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master SendReceive net6.0 1.31μs 0.617ns 2.39ns 0.0159 0 0 1.14 KB
master SendReceive netcoreapp3.1 1.73μs 0.831ns 3.11ns 0.0156 0 0 1.14 KB
master SendReceive net472 2.11μs 1.9ns 7.35ns 0.183 0.00106 0 1.16 KB
#6102 SendReceive net6.0 1.35μs 0.71ns 2.56ns 0.0162 0 0 1.14 KB
#6102 SendReceive netcoreapp3.1 1.72μs 0.602ns 2.33ns 0.0155 0 0 1.14 KB
#6102 SendReceive net472 2.12μs 1.24ns 4.81ns 0.183 0 0 1.16 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master EnrichedLog net6.0 2.66μs 0.929ns 3.6ns 0.0226 0 0 1.6 KB
master EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1 3.8μs 1.81ns 7.02ns 0.0227 0 0 1.65 KB
master EnrichedLog net472 4.42μs 1.66ns 6.43ns 0.322 0 0 2.04 KB
#6102 EnrichedLog net6.0 2.79μs 1.04ns 4.03ns 0.0224 0 0 1.6 KB
#6102 EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1 3.9μs 2.09ns 8.09ns 0.0217 0 0 1.65 KB
#6102 EnrichedLog net472 4.3μs 2.26ns 8.76ns 0.322 0 0 2.04 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark - Slower ⚠️ Same allocations ✔️

Slower ⚠️ in #6102

Benchmark diff/base Base Median (ns) Diff Median (ns) Modality
Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan‑netcoreapp3.1 1.161 547.79 636.19

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master StartFinishSpan net6.0 398ns 0.109ns 0.422ns 0.008 0 0 576 B
master StartFinishSpan netcoreapp3.1 548ns 0.359ns 1.39ns 0.00777 0 0 576 B
master StartFinishSpan net472 663ns 0.333ns 1.29ns 0.0916 0 0 578 B
master StartFinishScope net6.0 545ns 0.287ns 1.07ns 0.00966 0 0 696 B
master StartFinishScope netcoreapp3.1 785ns 0.298ns 1.16ns 0.0094 0 0 696 B
master StartFinishScope net472 838ns 0.422ns 1.64ns 0.104 0 0 658 B
#6102 StartFinishSpan net6.0 392ns 0.159ns 0.618ns 0.00808 0 0 576 B
#6102 StartFinishSpan netcoreapp3.1 636ns 0.613ns 2.3ns 0.00797 0 0 576 B
#6102 StartFinishSpan net472 650ns 0.299ns 1.16ns 0.0916 0 0 578 B
#6102 StartFinishScope net6.0 553ns 0.144ns 0.558ns 0.00972 0 0 696 B
#6102 StartFinishScope netcoreapp3.1 748ns 0.617ns 2.39ns 0.00933 0 0 696 B
#6102 StartFinishScope net472 822ns 0.244ns 0.943ns 0.105 0.000418 0 658 B
Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark - Faster 🎉 Same allocations ✔️

Faster 🎉 in #6102

Benchmark base/diff Base Median (ns) Diff Median (ns) Modality
Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin‑net6.0 1.234 736.19 596.45

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master RunOnMethodBegin net6.0 736ns 0.208ns 0.807ns 0.00958 0 0 696 B
master RunOnMethodBegin netcoreapp3.1 935ns 0.37ns 1.28ns 0.00942 0 0 696 B
master RunOnMethodBegin net472 1.1μs 0.959ns 3.72ns 0.105 0 0 658 B
#6102 RunOnMethodBegin net6.0 597ns 0.197ns 0.711ns 0.00976 0 0 696 B
#6102 RunOnMethodBegin netcoreapp3.1 994ns 0.804ns 3.12ns 0.00895 0 0 696 B
#6102 RunOnMethodBegin net472 1.19μs 0.357ns 1.38ns 0.104 0 0 658 B

@andrewlock
Copy link
Member

Throughput/Crank Report ⚡

Throughput results for AspNetCoreSimpleController comparing the following branches/commits:

Cases where throughput results for the PR are worse than latest master (5% drop or greater), results are shown in red.

Note that these results are based on a single point-in-time result for each branch. For full results, see one of the many, many dashboards!

gantt
    title Throughput Linux x64 (Total requests) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    section Baseline
    This PR (6102) (11.043M)   : 0, 11042703
    master (11.044M)   : 0, 11043629
    benchmarks/2.9.0 (11.081M)   : 0, 11080577

    section Automatic
    This PR (6102) (7.388M)   : 0, 7387880
    master (7.395M)   : 0, 7394522
    benchmarks/2.9.0 (7.732M)   : 0, 7732233

    section Trace stats
    master (7.557M)   : 0, 7557283

    section Manual
    master (11.055M)   : 0, 11055042

    section Manual + Automatic
    This PR (6102) (6.846M)   : 0, 6846480
    master (6.782M)   : 0, 6782217

    section DD_TRACE_ENABLED=0
    master (10.158M)   : 0, 10158294

Loading
gantt
    title Throughput Linux arm64 (Total requests) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    section Baseline
    This PR (6102) (9.604M)   : 0, 9603596
    master (9.515M)   : 0, 9514989
    benchmarks/2.9.0 (9.798M)   : 0, 9798067

    section Automatic
    This PR (6102) (6.577M)   : 0, 6576619
    master (6.542M)   : 0, 6542150

    section Trace stats
    master (6.818M)   : 0, 6817856

    section Manual
    master (9.487M)   : 0, 9486904

    section Manual + Automatic
    This PR (6102) (6.108M)   : 0, 6107738
    master (6.140M)   : 0, 6139999

    section DD_TRACE_ENABLED=0
    master (8.979M)   : 0, 8979042

Loading
gantt
    title Throughput Windows x64 (Total requests) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    section Baseline
    This PR (6102) (10.300M)   : 0, 10300130
    master (10.290M)   : 0, 10290194
    benchmarks/2.9.0 (10.067M)   : 0, 10067315

    section Automatic
    This PR (6102) (6.669M)   : 0, 6669334
    master (6.598M)   : 0, 6597608
    benchmarks/2.9.0 (7.552M)   : 0, 7552193

    section Trace stats
    master (7.423M)   : 0, 7423419

    section Manual
    master (10.074M)   : 0, 10074124

    section Manual + Automatic
    This PR (6102) (6.226M)   : 0, 6226133
    master (6.290M)   : 0, 6290240

    section DD_TRACE_ENABLED=0
    master (9.460M)   : 0, 9460167

Loading

Copy link
Member

@andrewlock andrewlock left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@bouwkast bouwkast merged commit d09331a into master Oct 1, 2024
74 checks passed
@bouwkast bouwkast deleted the steven/non-serial-xunit branch October 1, 2024 15:00
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the vNext-v3 milestone Oct 1, 2024
agocs pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 8, 2024
## Summary of changes

Removes warnings about non-serializable test data

```
Datadog.Trace.Tests: Non-serializable data ('System.Object[]') found for 'Datadog.Trace.Tests.Tagging.ActivityTagsTests.Tags_ShouldBe_PlacedInMetricsOrMeta'; falling back to single test case.
```

## Reason for change

Warnings about `Non-serializable data ('System.Object[]')`.

## Implementation details

Ignored them by setting `DisableDiscoveryEnumeration = true` on
`MemberData`.

## Test coverage

Ran tests locally, warning gone.

## Other details

Maybe I could've changed them to have serializable test data 🤷 
<!-- Fixes #{issue} -->

<!-- ⚠️ Note: where possible, please obtain 2 approvals prior to
merging. Unless CODEOWNERS specifies otherwise, for external teams it is
typically best to have one review from a team member, and one review
from apm-dotnet. Trivial changes do not require 2 reviews. -->
@andrewlock andrewlock added area:builds project files, build scripts, pipelines, versioning, releases, packages area:tests unit tests, integration tests labels Oct 23, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area:builds project files, build scripts, pipelines, versioning, releases, packages area:tests unit tests, integration tests
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants