Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bump jnr-unixsocket to 0.27 #102

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 18, 2020
Merged

Conversation

KSerrania
Copy link
Contributor

What does this PR do?

Upgrades the jnr-unixsocket dependency to 0.27, so that it uses the new version of jffi (1.2.23) which passes the MacOS notarization test.

Copy link
Member

@olivielpeau olivielpeau left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There are meaningful tests of the UDS setup in https://github.com/DataDog/java-dogstatsd-client/blob/master/src/test/java/com/timgroup/statsd/UnixSocketTest.java, so it seems to be relatively safe to merge this.

Will leave a merge to @truthbk though

@olivielpeau olivielpeau requested a review from truthbk February 17, 2020 17:35
Copy link
Member

@truthbk truthbk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks fine, some Java7 tests were removed from the jnr-unixsocket repo CI, but not due to incompatibilities in the code itself, but because Travis dropped support and they introduced spotbug. To double-check I cloned the repo, removed the spotbugs check and ran the tests on a Java7 JVM successfully.

This looks 👌

@truthbk truthbk merged commit 13a3952 into master Feb 18, 2020
@truthbk truthbk deleted the kserrania/bump-jnr-unixsocket-0.27 branch February 18, 2020 18:05
truthbk pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 25, 2020
dbyron0 pushed a commit to locationlabs/java-dogstatsd-client that referenced this pull request Jan 11, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants