Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DD_SERVICE; DD_ENV; DD_VERSION; DD_TAGS env vars support #107

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 1, 2020

Conversation

lpriima
Copy link
Contributor

@lpriima lpriima commented Mar 30, 2020

No description provided.

@lpriima lpriima force-pushed the lpriima/4-new-DD_env-vars branch from 38c5e55 to 25435b0 Compare March 30, 2020 18:24
@lpriima lpriima merged commit 17a0c39 into master Apr 1, 2020
@lpriima lpriima deleted the lpriima/4-new-DD_env-vars branch April 1, 2020 07:10
Copy link
Member

@truthbk truthbk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Mostly looks good, implementation is definitely clean. Please double check the new tags really have the format we want. Let's make sure we really want that dd prefix on all of them.

env,
version,
tags;
private static final String PREFIX = "dd";
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just wondering if this prefix is necessary. We mostly have service:foo for instance, not sure if it makes sense to introduce a different tag dd.service (for instance) for this. I'll let you discuss with your team. Obviously nothing's wrong with the implementation. Perhaps you did it because of the dd.internal.entitiy_id tag we were using which is prepended with dd?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

it's only for only these 4 tags. For other tags it might be different

@truthbk truthbk added this to the 2.10.0 milestone May 5, 2020
dbyron0 pushed a commit to locationlabs/java-dogstatsd-client that referenced this pull request Jan 11, 2021
prior to DataDog#107 (released in version
2.10.0), they were public.
dbyron0 pushed a commit to locationlabs/java-dogstatsd-client that referenced this pull request Jan 11, 2021
prior to DataDog#107 (released in version
2.10.0), they were public.
dbyron0 pushed a commit to locationlabs/java-dogstatsd-client that referenced this pull request Jan 11, 2021
prior to DataDog#107 (released in version
2.10.0), they were public.
truthbk pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 9, 2021
prior to #107 (released in version
2.10.0), they were public.

Co-authored-by: David Byron <david.byron@avast.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants