Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ci: setup reusable workflow for integration tests #158

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Aug 6, 2024

Conversation

eliottness
Copy link
Contributor

What does this PR do?

This PR creates a new workflow because we can't use the codecov workflow in dd-trace-go. Even if we are not technically using it because the if condition would have evaluated to false. cf. this job

Motivation

Add a CI connection dd-trace-go and orchestrion to make sure we don't break orchestrion features when changing dd-trace-go

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 11, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 64.76%. Comparing base (6feff0e) to head (1e01bab).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #158   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   64.76%   64.76%           
=======================================
  Files          76       76           
  Lines        3993     3993           
=======================================
  Hits         2586     2586           
  Misses       1134     1134           
  Partials      273      273           
Flag Coverage Δ
ARM64 47.65% <ø> (ø)
Linux 69.16% <ø> (ø)
Windows 46.53% <ø> (ø)
X64 64.76% <ø> (ø)
generator 42.67% <ø> (ø)
go1.21 55.29% <ø> (ø)
go1.22 51.91% <ø> (ø)
go1.23 51.64% <ø> (ø)
integration 46.93% <ø> (ø)
macOS 47.65% <ø> (ø)
unit 39.48% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@eliottness eliottness force-pushed the eliott.bouhana/smoke-tests branch 6 times, most recently from e43fbf0 to 69e0038 Compare July 12, 2024 15:13
.github/workflows/workflow_call.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
.github/workflows/workflow_call.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Signed-off-by: Eliott Bouhana <eliott.bouhana@datadoghq.com>
Signed-off-by: Eliott Bouhana <eliott.bouhana@datadoghq.com>
Signed-off-by: Eliott Bouhana <eliott.bouhana@datadoghq.com>
Signed-off-by: Eliott Bouhana <eliott.bouhana@datadoghq.com>
Signed-off-by: Eliott Bouhana <eliott.bouhana@datadoghq.com>
Signed-off-by: Eliott Bouhana <eliott.bouhana@datadoghq.com>
Signed-off-by: Eliott Bouhana <eliott.bouhana@datadoghq.com>
Signed-off-by: Eliott Bouhana <eliott.bouhana@datadoghq.com>
@eliottness eliottness marked this pull request as ready for review August 5, 2024 13:49
@eliottness eliottness requested a review from a team as a code owner August 5, 2024 13:49
@RomainMuller RomainMuller added this pull request to the merge queue Aug 6, 2024
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to no response for status checks Aug 6, 2024
@RomainMuller RomainMuller added this pull request to the merge queue Aug 6, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit 7a63af1 Aug 6, 2024
24 checks passed
@RomainMuller RomainMuller deleted the eliott.bouhana/smoke-tests branch August 6, 2024 10:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants