-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 246
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
add S3+R3 to Standard Pivot Points #671
add S3+R3 to Standard Pivot Points #671
Conversation
This is the one to leave open, you should close the other one. You can continue to add commits to your forked branch and they’ll be reflected here. |
I'm going to update S3 and R3 according to Wikipedia: R3 = H + 2×(P − L) = R1 + (H − L)
S3 = L − 2×(H − P) = S1 − (H − L) |
@myalgomate do a review on this change; then I'll merge it. |
Hi Dave, Better if we separate the new type with the name ChartIQ and follow the below calculations. Pivot Points formula are calculated as follows on Kite for ChartIQ: KITE(ChartIQ)Pivot point = (H + L + C) / 3 To put this into an example. Assume XYZ’s stock has it’s High(H) - 129.7, Low(L) - 126.9 and Close(C) - 127.35 respectively. So the pivot points in Kite would be calculated as follows :
Please check this post on TradingQ&A for a detailed explanation. |
you can push that changes in standard as Wikipedia and also add the ChartIQ type of Pivot |
Yah, these appear to be an entirely different flavor, but do like the reputation and authenticity of the references in Wikipedia for extending Standard. That blog sorta shows that there’s a lot of confusion around those other custom types. I’m sure there are quite a few variants out there we’ve not covered, but I do want to only include ones from reputable authors. |
Yeah, i understand the thing u suggested to rely on a reputed reference. If possible please add it to the separate type so to avoid our standard Pivot confusion as well. Atleast this will help all the ChartIQ platform users. |
Yes, best to keep separate. To consider ChartIQ though, I’d like to first find out if their formula has a reputable author or if they simple wrote some random equations that looked nice. It is possible, and I’ve seen this in other popular charting platforms, that they simply made a horrible mistake! 😄 |
This Pull Request has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new Issue for related bugs. |
Description
Adds S3+R3 to Standard Pivot Points
See #668
Checklist