Identifying emotion from speech is a non-trivial task pertaining to the ambiguous definition of emotion itself. In this work, we build light-weight multimodal machine learning models and compare it against the heavier and less interpretable deep learning counterparts. For both types of models, we use hand-crafted features from a given audio signal. Our experiments show that the light-weight models are comparable to the deep learning baselines and even outperform them in some cases, achieving state-of-the-art performance on the IEMOCAP dataset.
The hand-crafted feature vectors obtained are used to train two types of models:
- ML-based: Logistic Regression, SVMs, Random Forest, eXtreme Gradient Boosting and Multinomial Naive-Bayes.
- DL-based: Multi-Layer Perceptron, LSTM Classifier
This project was carried as a course project for the course CS 698 - Computational Audio taught by Prof. Richard Mann at the University of Waterloo. For a more detailed explanation, please check the report.
The IEMOCAP dataset was used for all the experiments in this work. Please refer to the report for a detailed explanation of pre-processing steps applied to the dataset.
All the experiments have been tested using the following libraries:
- xgboost==0.82
- torch==1.0.1.post2
- scikit-learn==0.20.3
- numpy==1.16.2
- jupyter==1.0.0
- pandas==0.24.1
- librosa==0.7.0
To avoid conflicts, it is recommended to setup a new python virtual environment to install these libraries. Once the env is setup, run pip install -r requirements.txt
to install the dependencies.
- Clone this repository by running
git clone git@github.com:Demfier/multimodal-speech-emotion-recognition
. - Go to the root directory of this project by running
cd multimodal-speech-emotion-recognition/
in your terminal. - Start a jupyter notebook by running
jupyter notebook
from the root of this project. - Run
1_extract_emotion_labels.ipynb
to extract labels from transriptions and compile other required data into a csv. - Run
2_build_audio_vectors.ipynb
to build vectors from the original wav files and save into a pickle file - Run
3_extract_audio_features.ipynb
to extract 8-dimensional audio feature vectors for the audio vectors - Run
4_prepare_data.ipynb
to preprocess and prepare audio + video data for experiments - It is recommended to train
LSTMClassifier
before running any other experiments for easy comparsion with other models later on:
- Change
config.py
for any of the experiment settings. For instance, if you want to train a speech2emotion classifier, make necessary changes tolstm_classifier/s2e/config.py
. Similar procedure follows for training text2emotion (t2e
) and text+speech2emotion (combined
) classifiers. - Run
python lstm_classifier.py
fromlstm_classifier/{exp_mode}
to train an LSTM classifier for the respective experiment mode (possible values ofexp_mode: s2e/t2e/combined
)
- Run
5_audio_classification.ipynb
to train ML classifiers for audio - Run
5.1_sentence_classification.ipynb
to train ML classifiers for text - Run
5.2_combined_classification.ipynb
to train ML classifiers for audio+text
Note: Make sure to include correct model paths in the notebooks as not everything is relative right now and it needs some refactoring
UPDATE: You can access the preprocessed data files here to skip the steps 4-7: https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fo/jdzz2y9nngw9rxsbz9vyj/h?rlkey=bji7zcqclusagzfwa7alm59hx&dl=0
Accuracy, F-score, Precision and Recall has been reported for the different experiments.
Audio
Models | Accuracy | F1 | Precision | Recall |
---|---|---|---|---|
RF | 56.0 | 56.0 | 57.2 | 57.3 |
XGB | 55.6 | 56.0 | 56.9 | 56.8 |
SVM | 33.7 | 15.2 | 17.4 | 21.5 |
MNB | 31.3 | 9.1 | 19.6 | 17.2 |
LR | 33.4 | 14.9 | 17.8 | 20.9 |
MLP | 41.0 | 36.5 | 42.2 | 35.9 |
LSTM | 43.6 | 43.4 | 53.2 | 40.6 |
ARE (4-class) | 56.3 | - | 54.6 | - |
E1 (4-class) | 56.2 | 45.9 | 67.6 | 48.9 |
E1 | 56.6 | 55.7 | 57.3 | 57.3 |
E1: Ensemble (RF + XGB + MLP)
Text
Models | Accuracy | F1 | Precision | Recall |
---|---|---|---|---|
RF | 62.2 | 60.8 | 65.0 | 62.0 |
XGB | 56.9 | 55.0 | 70.3 | 51.8 |
SVM | 62.1 | 61.7 | 62.5 | 63.5 |
MNB | 61.9 | 62.1 | 71.8 | 58.6 |
LR | 64.2 | 64.3 | 69.5 | 62.3 |
MLP | 60.6 | 61.5 | 62.4 | 63.0 |
LSTM | 63.1 | 62.5 | 65.3 | 62.8 |
TRE (4-class) | 65.5 | - | 63.5 | - |
E1 (4-class) | 63.1 | 61.4 | 67.7 | 59.0 |
E2 | 64.9 | 66.0 | 71.4 | 63.2 |
E2: Ensemble (RF + XGB + MLP + MNB + LR) E1: Ensemble (RF + XGB + MLP)
Audio + Text
Models | Accuracy | F1 | Precision | Recall |
---|---|---|---|---|
RF | 65.3 | 65.8 | 69.3 | 65.5 |
XGB | 62.2 | 63.1 | 67.9 | 61.7 |
SVM | 63.4 | 63.8 | 63.1 | 65.6 |
MNB | 60.5 | 60.3 | 70.3 | 57.1 |
MLP | 66.1 | 68.1 | 68.0 | 69.6 |
LR | 63.2 | 63.7 | 66.9 | 62.3 |
LSTM | 64.2 | 64.7 | 66.1 | 65.0 |
MDRE (4-class) | 75.3 | - | 71.8 | - |
E1 (4-class) | 70.3 | 67.5 | 73.2 | 65.5 |
E2 | 70.1 | 71.8 | 72.9 | 71.5 |
For more details, please refer to the report
If you find this work useful, please cite:
@article{sahu2019multimodal,
title={Multimodal Speech Emotion Recognition and Ambiguity Resolution},
author={Sahu, Gaurav},
journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:1904.06022},
year={2019}
}