should the root class for physical and in-silico models be "independent continuant"

[cmungall]

currently everything is rooted in BFO:0000004.

It's not clear that simulations are ICs, I think you want to treat physical models and simulations differently, shared by something like membrane_of some GO:membrane

OBOFoundry/COB#289

[DominikMartinat]

Thank you. I will try to solve it as soon as I can.

[egonw]

Thank you. I will try to solve it as soon as I can.

@DominikMartinat, see that book that I mentioned earlier from our library (from Barry Smidth and others).

[DominikMartinat]

@egonw Thanks for reminder. I will check the book first.

[cmungall]

Note that most obo groups are achieving bfo compatibility via cob

…

On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 12:58 AM Egon Willighagen ***@***.***> wrote: Thank you. I will try to solve it as soon as I can. @DominikMartinat <https://github.com/DominikMartinat>, see that book that I mentioned earlier from our library (from Barry Smidth and others). — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#3 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAAMMOPJ44T5QOFYTLN6PUL2FJZQDAVCNFSM6AAAAABTNT5OFSVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDKNBQGYYTEMBQHA> . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>