Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

DOC103: Code fix for well-known HTML entities #1

Closed
sharwell opened this issue Sep 14, 2018 · 1 comment
Closed

DOC103: Code fix for well-known HTML entities #1

sharwell opened this issue Sep 14, 2018 · 1 comment
Assignees
@sharwell
Labels
analyzer fixed
Milestone
1.0.0 Beta

Comments

@sharwell
Copy link
Member

Identify cases where a known HTML entity is used, but is not supported by XML documentation comments. For example, → is not supported in XML comments but the form → or the Unicode → can be used instead.
@sharwell sharwell mentioned this issue Sep 14, 2018
Closed
@sharwell
Copy link
Member Author

💭 It may be possible to implement this as a code fix only, triggered by CS1570.

@sharwell sharwell changed the title Code fix for well-known HTML entities DOC103: Code fix for well-known HTML entities Sep 19, 2018
@sharwell sharwell added this to the 1.0.0 Beta milestone Sep 20, 2018
sharwell added a commit to sharwell/DocumentationAnalyzers that referenced this issue Sep 21, 2018
@sharwell
Implement DOC103 (Use Unicode Characters)
ea7c1a2 
Closes DotNetAnalyzers#1
@sharwell sharwell mentioned this issue Sep 21, 2018
Merged
@sharwell sharwell self-assigned this Sep 21, 2018
sharwell added a commit to sharwell/DocumentationAnalyzers that referenced this issue Sep 21, 2018
@sharwell
Implement DOC103 (Use Unicode Characters)
28c3905 
Closes DotNetAnalyzers#1
@sharwell sharwell mentioned this issue Jul 9, 2021
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@sharwell sharwell

Labels
analyzer fixed
Projects
None yet
Milestone
1.0.0 Beta
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@sharwell