recipes: Switch away from S = WORKDIR and transition to UNPACKDIR fro… #225
Conversation
…m WORKDIR.
* Using S = ${WORKDIR} is no longer supported.
* UNPACKDIR is new contruct for do_unpack things in latest master we should be using that instead of WORKDIR for referencing those files.
* We don't know yet what changes will be needed to stay compatible with final styhead, but we already know that the last changes for UNPACKDIR aren't compatible with scarthgap, nanbield or others.
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-architecture/message/2007
https://docs.yoctoproject.org/dev/ref-manual/variables.html?highlight=unpackdir#term-UNPACKDIR
Signed-off-by: alperak <alperyasinak1@gmail.com>
|
Yes it doesn't like your layerconf @alperak
|
|
Yes, apparently CI doesn't like it. The reason is that it uses the scarthgap branch. This changes not compatible with scarthgap, nanbield. |
|
The layer compatibilty needs to stay compatible with the releases the layer is in fact compatible with... |
|
Oh I see - so |
|
ok so I think we need there to be a Poky |
|
styhead branch is not created yet but added as layer compability in master branch. For now, the master branch can be used for testing. |
|
We'll need a commit to get the CI building then for master... |
…m WORKDIR.
Using S = ${WORKDIR} is no longer supported.
UNPACKDIR is new contruct for do_unpack things in latest master we should be using that instead of WORKDIR for referencing those files.
We don't know yet what changes will be needed to stay compatible with final styhead, but we already know that the last changes for UNPACKDIR aren't compatible with scarthgap, nanbield or others.
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-architecture/message/2007
https://docs.yoctoproject.org/next/migration-guides/migration-5.1.html#workdir-changes