Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add highavailability option for webhook via helm #713

Merged

Conversation

waodim
Copy link
Contributor

@waodim waodim commented Apr 8, 2022

Description

Introduces a new option for the webhook. The flag is called enableHighAvailability and can be found in the helm charts in the values.yaml file. Changes the replicas of the webhook deployment from 1 to 2 and also introduces a PodDisruptionBudget with minAvailable set to 1. Also topologySpreadConstraints are set.

How can this be tested?

Set the flag to true, render a chart and apply the output file.

Checklist

  • Unit tests have been updated/added
  • PR is labeled accordingly

@waodim waodim added the helm Changes to helm templates or values file label Apr 8, 2022
@waodim waodim requested a review from a team as a code owner April 8, 2022 09:51
@chrismuellner chrismuellner merged commit b2d46cc into release-0.6 Apr 12, 2022
@chrismuellner chrismuellner deleted the feature/add-highavailability-opt-for-webhook branch April 12, 2022 08:26
waodim added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 14, 2022
Co-authored-by: Christoph Muellner <33160506+chrismuellner@users.noreply.github.com>
waodim added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 21, 2022
* Fix typo

* Add highavailability option for webhook via helm (#713)

Co-authored-by: Christoph Muellner <33160506+chrismuellner@users.noreply.github.com>

* Readd image field

Co-authored-by: Christoph Muellner <33160506+chrismuellner@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
helm Changes to helm templates or values file
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants