This repository has been archived by the owner on Aug 2, 2022. It is now read-only.
optimization when writing shared_blob data #6501
Merged
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Change Description
@taokayan analyzed the cost associated with the
resize
+memcpy
approach to updating these buffers and discovered thatresize
was very slow. In addition, the default copy constructor forshared_blob
had the same issues.using
assign
directly in both cases was a clear win.I've ported these changes from another branch @taokayan shared with so that they can be adopted for the 1.6.0-rc1 pre-release.
Consensus Changes
none
API Changes
none
Documentation Additions