Does ESMValTool have a general principle on whether it should fail or warn when inputs are missing? #2435
-
A question was asked during review of the radiation budget PR (#2282): does ESMValTool have a general principle on whether it should fail or warn when inputs are missing? In the case of our PR, we are extracting cubes from a cubelist. If one is missing, should the code fail? Or should the code warn, then attempt to produce the plots with whatever data are available? Is there any documentation available regarding this? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Answered by
bouweandela
Apr 26, 2023
Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
@bouweandela and @valeriupredoi - Could you address this or redirect as needed? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
There is no guideline available, just use common sense: if the results are still scientifically meaningful with some missing data a warning might be sufficient, if not, raise an error.