Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Oct 15, 2024. It is now read-only.

make mount not fail if mp exists #1306

Closed
4 tasks
markus2330 opened this issue Jan 30, 2017 · 13 comments
Closed
4 tasks

make mount not fail if mp exists #1306

markus2330 opened this issue Jan 30, 2017 · 13 comments
Assignees
@flo91
Labels
stale usability
Milestone
0.9.*

Comments

@markus2330
Copy link
Contributor

markus2330 commented Jan 30, 2017 •
edited
Loading

If someone tries to mount something that is mounted already, we should not fail. (If it would do exactly the same action)

Affected:

  • mount (the script elektra-mount is basically already a workaround for it)
  • global-mount see MSR: replace grep -P with sed #1301 src/plugins/conditionals/README.md
  • elektra-mountcan be removed then

Unclear:

  • do we need an option to disable this behavior?
@markus2330 markus2330 mentioned this issue Jan 30, 2017
Closed
@markus2330 markus2330 added this to the 0.8.20 milestone Mar 19, 2017
@sanssecours sanssecours mentioned this issue Apr 8, 2017
Merged
2 tasks
@sanssecours sanssecours modified the milestones: 0.8.20, 1.0.0 Oct 25, 2017
@markus2330 markus2330 modified the milestones: 1.0.0, 0.8.20, 0.8.21 Oct 29, 2017
@markus2330
Copy link
Contributor Author

I have set the milestone to 0.8.21 because it should be part of LCDproc release.

We also need this feature for #1374 and #1663

@sanssecours sanssecours self-assigned this Dec 11, 2017
@markus2330 markus2330 modified the milestones: 0.8.21, 0.8.22 Dec 17, 2017
@markus2330
Copy link
Contributor Author

A simple way to implement that feature would be to have a -f option which cuts the mountpoint's config before doing the mount.

If this is not a good way, we should rather move this feature to 0.8.22.

@markus2330 markus2330 assigned markus2330 and unassigned sanssecours Dec 17, 2017
markus2330 pushed a commit that referenced this issue Dec 19, 2017
kdb-mount: experimental strategy feature
3cd0a53 
"--strategy unchanged" as discussed #1306
seems to be buggy:
e.g. if plugins add plugin config (like dump)
     parent keys disappear and it seems like
     the config was changed (although it was not)
@markus2330 markus2330 mentioned this issue Dec 19, 2017
Merged
7 tasks
@markus2330 markus2330 modified the milestones: 0.8.21, 0.8.22 Dec 22, 2017
@markus2330 markus2330 modified the milestones: 0.8.22, 0.8.23 Feb 24, 2018
@markus2330 markus2330 modified the milestones: 0.8.23, 0.8.24 Apr 15, 2018
@markus2330 markus2330 modified the milestones: 0.8.24, 0.9.0 Aug 18, 2018
@dominicjaeger dominicjaeger mentioned this issue Nov 17, 2019
Closed
dominicjaeger added a commit to dominicjaeger/libelektra that referenced this issue Nov 19, 2019
@dominicjaeger
kdb mount: Use merge library
41de4d4 
This partly closes ElektraInitiative#1306 and ElektraInitiative#3131
dominicjaeger added a commit to dominicjaeger/libelektra that referenced this issue Nov 20, 2019
@dominicjaeger
kdb mount: Use merge library
d795caa 
This partly closes ElektraInitiative#1306 and ElektraInitiative#3131
dominicjaeger added a commit to dominicjaeger/libelektra that referenced this issue Nov 20, 2019
@dominicjaeger
kdb mount: Use merge library
293de1c 
This partly closes ElektraInitiative#1306 and ElektraInitiative#3131
dominicjaeger added a commit to dominicjaeger/libelektra that referenced this issue Nov 21, 2019
@dominicjaeger
kdb mount: Use merge library
1a18738 
This partly closes ElektraInitiative#1306 and ElektraInitiative#3131
@dominicjaeger dominicjaeger mentioned this issue Nov 22, 2019
Closed
16 tasks
dominicjaeger added a commit to dominicjaeger/libelektra that referenced this issue Dec 8, 2019
@dominicjaeger
kdb mount: Use merge library
c71d6b5 
This partly closes ElektraInitiative#1306 and ElektraInitiative#3131
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Oct 29, 2020

I mark this issue stale as it did not have any activity for one year. I'll close it in two weeks if no further activity occurs. If you want it to be alive again, ping the issue by writing a message here or create a new issue with the remainder of this issue.
Thank you for your contributions 💖

@stale stale bot added the stale label Oct 29, 2020
@markus2330 markus2330 removed the stale label Oct 29, 2020
@markus2330 markus2330 mentioned this issue Nov 26, 2020
Closed
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Oct 30, 2021

I mark this issue stale as it did not have any activity for one year. I'll close it in two weeks if no further activity occurs. If you want it to be alive again, ping the issue by writing a message here or create a new issue with the remainder of this issue.
Thank you for your contributions 💖

@stale stale bot added the stale label Oct 30, 2021
@stale stale bot removed the stale label Nov 3, 2021
@markus2330 markus2330 added the project2022w Suitable as project label Mar 7, 2022
@markus2330 markus2330 mentioned this issue Mar 15, 2022
Closed
@markus2330
Copy link
Contributor Author

Project would be together with #1322.

@markus2330
Copy link
Contributor Author

@flo91 Having idempotency in mounting would be essential.

@markus2330 markus2330 removed the project2022w Suitable as project label Sep 27, 2022
@markus2330 markus2330 mentioned this issue Sep 27, 2022
Closed
@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link

I mark this stale as it did not have any activity for one year. I'll close it in two weeks if no further activity occurs. If you want it to be alive again, ping by writing a message here or create a new issue with the remainder of this issue.
Thank you for your contributions 💖

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale label Feb 20, 2024
@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Mar 5, 2024

I closed this now because it has been inactive for more than one year. If I closed it by mistake, please do not hesitate to reopen it or create a new issue with the remainder of this issue.
Thank you for your contributions 💖

@github-actions github-actions bot closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Mar 5, 2024
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this to Done in 1.0 Aug 28, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Assignees

@flo91 flo91

Labels
stale usability
Projects
1.0
Status: Done
Milestone
0.9.*
Development

No branches or pull requests
4 participants
@sanssecours @markus2330 @flo91 @dominicjaeger