-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 381
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Missing the asset balance after the transactions is trusted false #884
Comments
I don't really understand what situation you're in. Could you give a bit more information? |
I created the Elements blockchain network and implemented the Block signing federation using Kafka. Then I issued an asset and did the multiple transactions. After 2 multiple consecutive transactions with the same amount from the same wallet and one of that transaction failed. And I noticed that in the transaction details the param trusted is return as false and I lost the remaining balance in that wallet. |
This is how the bool CWalletTx::IsTrusted(interfaces::Chain::Lock& locked_chain) const
{
LockAnnotation lock(::cs_main); // Temporary, for CheckFinalTx below. Removed in upcoming commit.
// Quick answer in most cases
if (!CheckFinalTx(*tx))
return false;
int nDepth = GetDepthInMainChain(locked_chain);
if (nDepth >= 1)
return true;
if (nDepth < 0)
return false;
if (!pwallet->m_spend_zero_conf_change || !IsFromMe(ISMINE_ALL)) // using wtx's cached debit
return false;
// Don't trust unconfirmed transactions from us unless they are in the mempool.
if (!InMempool())
return false;
// Trusted if all inputs are from us and are in the mempool:
for (const CTxIn& txin : tx->vin)
{
// Transactions not sent by us: not trusted
const CWalletTx* parent = pwallet->GetWalletTx(txin.prevout.hash);
if (parent == nullptr)
return false;
const CTxOut& parentOut = parent->tx->vout[txin.prevout.n];
if (pwallet->IsMine(parentOut) != ISMINE_SPENDABLE)
return false;
}
return true;
} So it can be that the tx is dropped from the mempool for some reason. Did you accidentally double-spend the same coins? |
…erministic f899580 tests: Make coins_tests/updatecoins_simulation_test deterministic (practicalswift) Pull request description: Make `coins_tests/updatecoins_simulation_test` deterministic. Before: ``` $ contrib/devtools/test_deterministic_coverage.sh 1000 [2019-06-15 05:36:20] Measuring coverage, run #1 of 1000 [2019-06-15 05:38:05] Measuring coverage, run #2 of 1000 [2019-06-15 05:39:49] Measuring coverage, run #3 of 1000 [2019-06-15 05:41:38] Measuring coverage, run #4 of 1000 [2019-06-15 05:43:16] Measuring coverage, run #5 of 1000 ... [2019-06-16 18:25:23] Measuring coverage, run #880 of 1000 [2019-06-16 18:27:12] Measuring coverage, run #881 of 1000 [2019-06-16 18:29:33] Measuring coverage, run #882 of 1000 [2019-06-16 18:33:00] Measuring coverage, run #883 of 1000 [2019-06-16 18:35:32] Measuring coverage, run #884 of 1000 The line coverage is non-deterministic between runs. Exiting. The test suite must be deterministic in the sense that the set of lines executed at least once must be identical between runs. This is a necessary condition for meaningful coverage measuring. --- gcovr.run-1.txt 2019-06-15 05:38:05.282359029 +0200 +++ gcovr.run-884.txt 2019-06-16 18:37:23.518298374 +0200 @@ -269,7 +269,7 @@ test/bloom_tests.cpp 320 320 100% test/bswap_tests.cpp 13 13 100% test/checkqueue_tests.cpp 223 222 99% 169 -test/coins_tests.cpp 478 472 98% 52,68,344-345,511,524 +test/coins_tests.cpp 478 474 99% 52,68,511,524 test/compilerbug_tests.cpp 18 18 100% test/compress_tests.cpp 27 27 100% test/crypto_tests.cpp 268 268 100% @@ -401,5 +401,5 @@ zmq/zmqpublishnotifier.h 5 0 0% 12,31,37,43,49 zmq/zmqrpc.cpp 23 3 13% 16,18,20,23,33-35,37,40-47,51,62,64-65 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ -TOTAL 53323 28305 53% +TOTAL 53323 28307 53% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ``` After: ``` $ contrib/devtools/test_deterministic_coverage.sh 1000 [2019-06-15 05:36:20] Measuring coverage, run #1 of 1000 [2019-06-15 05:38:05] Measuring coverage, run #2 of 1000 [2019-06-15 05:39:49] Measuring coverage, run #3 of 1000 [2019-06-15 05:41:38] Measuring coverage, run #4 of 1000 [2019-06-15 05:43:16] Measuring coverage, run #5 of 1000 ... $ ``` ACKs for commit f89958: MarcoFalke: ACK f899580 (checked that the randomness state of g_insecure_rand_ctx is the same after three test runs) Tree-SHA512: 796d362b050c5750e351de1126b62f0f2c8e2d712cf01b6e1a3e2cc6ef92fa68439a32fc24c76d34bce4d553aee4ae4ea88a036c56eb9e25979649a19c59c3e5
After this transaction, the asset balance is not showing as expected. When I check the transaction history using
listtransaction
function and manually calculate the balance it is not matching with thegetbalance
function.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: