Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Re-enable rpc tests wallet.py and walletbackup.py #77

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

jonasnick
Copy link
Contributor

Depends on #74

@instagibbs
Copy link
Collaborator

We should probably forward port this to elements-0.13.1.

@jtimon jtimon added the alpha label Mar 7, 2017
instagibbs added a commit to instagibbs/elements that referenced this pull request Mar 15, 2017
…-flags

Refactor: Make CWallet::mapAssetLabels and mapAssets private
@jtimon
Copy link
Contributor

jtimon commented Jul 19, 2017

Closing all alpha open PRs for clarity. We can always reopen them if this is a mistake.

@jtimon jtimon closed this Jul 19, 2017
apoelstra pushed a commit to apoelstra/elements that referenced this pull request Dec 3, 2020
ac64cec gui: create wallet: add advanced section (Sjors Provoost)
c99d6f6 gui: create wallet: name placeholder (Sjors Provoost)
5bff825 [gui] create wallet: smarter checkbox toggling (Sjors Provoost)

Pull request description:

  Previously only users who needed a second wallet had to use to the create wallet dialog. With the merge of bitcoin/bitcoin#15454 now all new users have to. I don't think it was user-friendly enough for that.

  <img width="403" alt="Schermafbeelding 2020-09-18 om 09 41 44" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/10217/93574129-52ef9680-f998-11ea-9a6f-31144f66d3bf.png">

  This PR makes a few simple improvements so that new users don't have to think too much:

  <img width="369" alt="Schermafbeelding 2020-10-15 om 16 45 22" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/10217/96145959-0c914700-0f06-11eb-9526-cf447d841d7a.png">

  It's lightly inspired by ElementsProject#77. It would be better if those changes made it into the upcoming release, but this PR is a good start imo.

  * wallet encryption is no longer checked by default, because such a change in the default needs a separate discussion (fwiw, I suspect it increases the number of users losing access to coins)
  * watch-only and descriptor wallet stuff is moved to advanced, so new users know they can safely ignore these check boxes
  * bonus: when you click on "disable private keys" it disables encrypt wallet and checks blank wallet
  * label changes: see screenshot
  * tooltip changes: see code diff

  Note that a blank wallet name isn't allowed in the dialog; I haven't addressed that.

  _Update 2020-10-30_, dropped the new strings for now:
  <img width="450" alt="Schermafbeelding 2020-10-30 om 11 26 55" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/10217/97694591-1b99fc80-1aa3-11eb-8b85-e19f1ad5add4.png">

ACKs for top commit:
  fjahr:
    Tested ACK ac64cec
  jonatack:
    re-ACK ac64cec, per `git diff d393708 ac64cec` only change since my last review is improving the placeholder from "MyWallet" to "Wallet" and dropping the last commit. Tested creating a dozen wallets in signet with different combinations of options and then verifying/comparing their characteristics in the console with getwalletinfo. My remaining caveats are (1) the need for less user surprise by either (a) improving the user info or (b) with less auto-(un)selecting as mentioned in bitcoin-core/gui#96 (comment) and (2) I prefer the "Encrypt private keys" and "Watch-only" wording and descriptions below over the current ones; hopefully these can be addressed in a follow-up.
  hebasto:
    re-ACK ac64cec
  ryanofsky:
    Code review ACK ac64cec. Only changes since last review are tweaking placeholder text and dropping "allow nameless" commit

Tree-SHA512: a25f84eb66ee4f99af441d73e33928df9d9cf592177398ef48f0037f5913699e47a162cf1301c83b34501546d43ff4ae12607fd078c5c03b92f573bf7604a9f2
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants