Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Some minor dynafed improvements #958

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Mar 2, 2021

Conversation

stevenroose
Copy link
Member

  • support blocksigners specifying their own activation to make coordination a bit more flexible
  • don't force fedpeg script to change in order to change the block signing script

This allows the initial relaxed restriction on non-segwit fedpeg
programs to be extended as long as the fedpeg program is not changed
while the block signing parameters can be changed.
This should obviously only be done by blocksigners. The flag used is not
documented.
Copy link
Member

@apoelstra apoelstra left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ack fe03729

Copy link
Member

@apoelstra apoelstra left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utack 14a42a0

@gwillen
Copy link
Contributor

gwillen commented Feb 26, 2021

utACK, looks reasonable.

@stevenroose stevenroose merged commit 3b8e407 into ElementsProject:master Mar 2, 2021
stevenroose added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 3, 2021
868e92f Add two missing dynafed fields to getblockchaininfo (Steven Roose)
ae54a1b dynafed: Support changing mainnet dynafed activation (Steven Roose)
0f9b1a2 dynafed: Only verify proposed parameters if they differ from current (Steven Roose)

Pull request description:

  Backport of #958.

Tree-SHA512: d3f809e466b98f48ba76b8deacc1fc7516440089cd9146a94e9b53ef0dc20f9e53af88cc9edc507de6ccb2da74bf83ef3722f1ab81bb385e2b9a567a4d1f7e99
apoelstra added a commit to apoelstra/elements that referenced this pull request Mar 26, 2021
Conflicts due to change of error state formatting upstream.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants