Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Lr/epoch tests #3952

Merged
merged 90 commits into from
Dec 19, 2024
Merged

Lr/epoch tests #3952

merged 90 commits into from
Dec 19, 2024

Conversation

lukaszrzasik
Copy link
Contributor

Closes #<ISSUE_NUMBER>

This PR:

This PR does not:

Key places to review:

Base automatically changed from lr/double-quorum to main December 18, 2024 16:16
@lukaszrzasik lukaszrzasik marked this pull request as ready for review December 19, 2024 14:14
@sveitser sveitser requested a review from pls148 December 19, 2024 14:18
@@ -225,6 +225,7 @@ impl<TYPES: NodeType, I: TestableNodeImplementation<TYPES>, V: Versions> TestTas
self.ctx.successful_views.insert(view_number);
// if a view succeeds remove it from the failed views
self.ctx.failed_views.remove(&view_number);
tracing::error!("lrzasik: successful view: {:?}", view_number);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

leftover debug trace?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

good catch, thank you!

Copy link
Contributor

@pls148 pls148 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think you left a debug trace behind but other than that this looks good

@lukaszrzasik lukaszrzasik merged commit 3d705c6 into main Dec 19, 2024
17 checks passed
@lukaszrzasik lukaszrzasik deleted the lr/epoch-tests branch December 19, 2024 19:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants