Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Design Audit] Consistent heading & description type and spacing for 4.0 (Mar) #7623

Open
4 of 14 tasks
SkyeSeitz opened this issue Aug 30, 2023 · 3 comments
Open
4 of 14 tasks
Labels
0 - new New issues that need assignment. ArcGIS Maps SDK for JavaScript Issues logged by ArcGIS SDK for JavaScript team members. Calcite (design) Issues logged by Calcite designers. calcite-components Issues specific to the @esri/calcite-components package. design Issues that need design consultation prior to development. enhancement Issues tied to a new feature or request. estimate - design - sm Small design effort; 1-4 days of design work estimate - 5 A few days of work, definitely requires updates to tests. impact - p3 - not time sensitive User set priority impact status of p3 - not time sensitive p - high Issue should be addressed in the current milestone, impacts component or core functionality ready for dev Issues ready for development implementation. visual changes Issues with visual changes that are added for consistency, but are not backwards compatible

Comments

@SkyeSeitz
Copy link

SkyeSeitz commented Aug 30, 2023

Check existing issues

Description

A decent handful of components contain a title & description pairing that could share a consistent type and gap treatment.

Acceptance Criteria

See Figma file for audit and specs.
cc @ashetland @macandcheese

image

Which Component

Example Use Case

No response

Priority impact

p4 - not time sensitive

Calcite package

  • @esri/calcite-components
  • @esri/calcite-components-react

Esri team

Calcite (design)

@SkyeSeitz SkyeSeitz added enhancement Issues tied to a new feature or request. 0 - new New issues that need assignment. needs triage Planning workflow - pending design/dev review. labels Aug 30, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot added Calcite (design) Issues logged by Calcite designers. impact - p3 - not time sensitive User set priority impact status of p3 - not time sensitive calcite-components Issues specific to the @esri/calcite-components package. labels Aug 30, 2023
@ashetland ashetland added the design Issues that need design consultation prior to development. label Dec 7, 2023
@sagewall
Copy link

sagewall commented Dec 7, 2023

The ArcGIS Maps SDK for JavaScript LayerList is being refactored to use the calcite-list component and we've received some feedback that the font size is too small. Hoping this issue might resolve that. Is there any way to get this prioritized?

@geospatialem geospatialem added the ArcGIS Maps SDK for JavaScript Issues logged by ArcGIS SDK for JavaScript team members. label Dec 8, 2023
@brittneytewks brittneytewks added p - low Issue is non core or affecting less that 10% of people using the library estimate - design - sm Small design effort; 1-4 days of design work ready for dev Issues ready for development implementation. and removed needs triage Planning workflow - pending design/dev review. labels Dec 14, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot added the needs milestone Planning workflow - pending milestone assignment, has priority and/or estimate. label Dec 14, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

cc @geospatialem, @brittneytewks

@brittneytewks brittneytewks removed the needs milestone Planning workflow - pending milestone assignment, has priority and/or estimate. label Dec 14, 2023
@SkyeSeitz
Copy link
Author

The ArcGIS Maps SDK for JavaScript LayerList is being refactored to use the calcite-list component and we've received some feedback that the font size is too small. Hoping this issue might resolve that. Is there any way to get this prioritized?

Thanks, @sagewall - Agreed. This issue would look at bringing List Item text in line with the type size of the other similar components included in this audit. Prioritized for Feb 👍🏽

@github-actions github-actions bot added the p4 - not time sensitive User set priority status of p4 - not time sensitive label Jul 17, 2024
@ashetland ashetland changed the title [Design Audit] Consistent title & description type and spacing [Design Audit] Consistent heading & description type and spacing Jul 26, 2024
@ashetland ashetland added the visual changes Issues with visual changes that are added for consistency, but are not backwards compatible label Aug 1, 2024
@DitwanP DitwanP changed the title [Design Audit] Consistent heading & description type and spacing [Design Audit] Consistent heading & description type and spacing for 4.0 (Mar) Nov 19, 2024
@DitwanP DitwanP added estimate - 5 A few days of work, definitely requires updates to tests. p - high Issue should be addressed in the current milestone, impacts component or core functionality and removed p - low Issue is non core or affecting less that 10% of people using the library p4 - not time sensitive User set priority status of p4 - not time sensitive labels Nov 19, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
0 - new New issues that need assignment. ArcGIS Maps SDK for JavaScript Issues logged by ArcGIS SDK for JavaScript team members. Calcite (design) Issues logged by Calcite designers. calcite-components Issues specific to the @esri/calcite-components package. design Issues that need design consultation prior to development. enhancement Issues tied to a new feature or request. estimate - design - sm Small design effort; 1-4 days of design work estimate - 5 A few days of work, definitely requires updates to tests. impact - p3 - not time sensitive User set priority impact status of p3 - not time sensitive p - high Issue should be addressed in the current milestone, impacts component or core functionality ready for dev Issues ready for development implementation. visual changes Issues with visual changes that are added for consistency, but are not backwards compatible
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants