[Design Audit] Consistent heading & description type and spacing for 4.0 (Mar) #7623
Open
4 of 14 tasks
Labels
0 - new
New issues that need assignment.
ArcGIS Maps SDK for JavaScript
Issues logged by ArcGIS SDK for JavaScript team members.
Calcite (design)
Issues logged by Calcite designers.
calcite-components
Issues specific to the @esri/calcite-components package.
design
Issues that need design consultation prior to development.
enhancement
Issues tied to a new feature or request.
estimate - design - sm
Small design effort; 1-4 days of design work
estimate - 5
A few days of work, definitely requires updates to tests.
impact - p3 - not time sensitive
User set priority impact status of p3 - not time sensitive
p - high
Issue should be addressed in the current milestone, impacts component or core functionality
ready for dev
Issues ready for development implementation.
visual changes
Issues with visual changes that are added for consistency, but are not backwards compatible
Milestone
Check existing issues
Description
A decent handful of components contain a title & description pairing that could share a consistent type and gap treatment.
Acceptance Criteria
See Figma file for audit and specs.
cc @ashetland @macandcheese
Which Component
heading
anddescription
line heights #9862Example Use Case
No response
Priority impact
p4 - not time sensitive
Calcite package
Esri team
Calcite (design)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: