Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Security upgrade socket.io from 2.4.0 to 4.8.0 #159

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Exnadella
Copy link
Owner

@Exnadella Exnadella commented Sep 21, 2024

User description

snyk-top-banner

Snyk has created this PR to fix 1 vulnerabilities in the npm dependencies of this project.

Snyk changed the following file(s):

  • packages/web-component-tester/package.json
  • packages/web-component-tester/package-lock.json

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed with an upgrade:

Issue Score
high severity Denial of Service (DoS)
SNYK-JS-WS-7266574
  696  

Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
📜 Customise PR templates
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read about Snyk's upgrade logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Denial of Service (DoS)


PR Type

enhancement, bug_fix


Description

  • Upgraded socket.io dependency in package.json from version 2.0.3 to 4.8.0 to address a high severity vulnerability related to Denial of Service (DoS).
  • The upgrade aims to reduce vulnerabilities in the project as identified by Snyk.

Changes walkthrough 📝

Relevant files
Enhancement
package.json
Upgrade socket.io to address vulnerabilities                         

packages/web-component-tester/package.json

  • Upgraded socket.io from version 2.0.3 to 4.8.0.
+1/-1     
Additional files (token-limit)
package-lock.json
...                                                                                                           

packages/web-component-tester/package-lock.json

...

+11630/-11896

💡 PR-Agent usage:
Comment /help on the PR to get a list of all available PR-Agent tools and their descriptions

…ent-tester/package-lock.json to reduce vulnerabilities

The following vulnerabilities are fixed with an upgrade:
- https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JS-WS-7266574
Copy link

PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 1 🔵⚪⚪⚪⚪
🧪 No relevant tests
🔒 No security concerns identified
⚡ No key issues to review

Copy link

PR Code Suggestions ✨

CategorySuggestion                                                                                                                                    Score
Best practice
Review major version upgrade changelogs for potential breaking changes

Review the changelog for socket.io 4.x to ensure compatibility with your existing
code, as this is a major version upgrade from 2.x to 4.x.

packages/web-component-tester/package.json [78]

+"socket.io": "^4.8.0",
 
-
  • Apply this suggestion
Suggestion importance[1-10]: 9

Why: Reviewing the changelog for a major version upgrade is crucial to identify any breaking changes that could affect existing code, ensuring a smooth transition and maintaining functionality.

9
Update related dependencies when upgrading a major package version

Consider updating other dependencies that might be affected by the socket.io
upgrade. For example, socket.io-client should typically be updated to match the
server version.

packages/web-component-tester/package.json [78]

 "socket.io": "^4.8.0",
+"socket.io-client": "^4.8.0",
 
  • Apply this suggestion
Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8

Why: The suggestion to update socket.io-client to match the socket.io version is a good practice to ensure compatibility between the server and client components, especially when upgrading to a major version.

8

💡 Need additional feedback ? start a PR chat

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants