Merge pull request #39217 from Expensify/yuwenmemon-cherry-pick-stagi…

…ng-39024-1

🍒 Cherry pick PR #39024 to staging 🍒

android/app/build.gradle

@@ -98,8 +98,8 @@ android {
         minSdkVersion rootProject.ext.minSdkVersion
         targetSdkVersion rootProject.ext.targetSdkVersion
         multiDexEnabled rootProject.ext.multiDexEnabled
-        versionCode 1001045703
-        versionName "1.4.57-3"
+        versionCode 1001045704
+        versionName "1.4.57-4"
     }
 
     flavorDimensions "default"

ios/NewExpensify/Info.plist

@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@
 		</dict>
 	</array>
 	<key>CFBundleVersion</key>
-	<string>1.4.57.3</string>
+	<string>1.4.57.4</string>
 	<key>ITSAppUsesNonExemptEncryption</key>
 	<false/>
 	<key>LSApplicationQueriesSchemes</key>

ios/NewExpensifyTests/Info.plist

@@ -19,6 +19,6 @@
 	<key>CFBundleSignature</key>
 	<string>????</string>
 	<key>CFBundleVersion</key>
-	<string>1.4.57.3</string>
+	<string>1.4.57.4</string>
 </dict>
 </plist>

ios/NotificationServiceExtension/Info.plist

@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@
 	<key>CFBundleShortVersionString</key>
 	<string>1.4.57</string>
 	<key>CFBundleVersion</key>
-	<string>1.4.57.3</string>
+	<string>1.4.57.4</string>
 	<key>NSExtension</key>
 	<dict>
 		<key>NSExtensionPointIdentifier</key>

package.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "name": "new.expensify",
-  "version": "1.4.57-3",
+  "version": "1.4.57-4",
   "author": "Expensify, Inc.",
   "homepage": "https://new.expensify.com",
   "description": "New Expensify is the next generation of Expensify: a reimagination of payments based atop a foundation of chat.",

src/libs/API/index.ts

@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ import * as Pusher from '@libs/Pusher/pusher';
 import * as Request from '@libs/Request';
 import CONST from '@src/CONST';
 import type OnyxRequest from '@src/types/onyx/Request';
+import type {RequestConflictResolver} from '@src/types/onyx/Request';
 import type Response from '@src/types/onyx/Response';
 import pkg from '../../../package.json';
 import type {ApiRequest, ApiRequestCommandParameters, ReadCommand, SideEffectRequestCommand, WriteCommand} from './types';
@@ -51,8 +52,14 @@ type OnyxData = {
  * @param [onyxData.successData] - Onyx instructions that will be passed to Onyx.update() when the response has jsonCode === 200.
  * @param [onyxData.failureData] - Onyx instructions that will be passed to Onyx.update() when the response has jsonCode !== 200.
  * @param [onyxData.finallyData] - Onyx instructions that will be passed to Onyx.update() when the response has jsonCode === 200 or jsonCode !== 200.
+ * @param [conflictResolver] - callbacks used in special cases to detect and handle conflicting requests in the sequential queue
  */
-function write<TCommand extends WriteCommand>(command: TCommand, apiCommandParameters: ApiRequestCommandParameters[TCommand], onyxData: OnyxData = {}) {
+function write<TCommand extends WriteCommand>(
+    command: TCommand,
+    apiCommandParameters: ApiRequestCommandParameters[TCommand],
+    onyxData: OnyxData = {},
+    conflictResolver: RequestConflictResolver = {},
+) {
     Log.info('Called API write', false, {command, ...apiCommandParameters});
     const {optimisticData, ...onyxDataWithoutOptimisticData} = onyxData;
 
@@ -83,6 +90,7 @@ function write<TCommand extends WriteCommand>(command: TCommand, apiCommandParam
             canCancel: true,
         },
         ...onyxDataWithoutOptimisticData,
+        ...conflictResolver,
     };
 
     // Write commands can be saved and retried, so push it to the SequentialQueue

src/libs/API/parameters/OpenReportParams.ts

@@ -7,7 +7,14 @@ type OpenReportParams = {
     shouldRetry?: boolean;
     createdReportActionID?: string;
     clientLastReadTime?: string;
+<<<<<<< HEAD
     idempotencyKey?: string;
+=======
+    groupChatAdminLogins?: string;
+    reportName?: string;
+    chatType?: string;
+    optimisticAccountIDList?: string;
+>>>>>>> 3f3869a (Merge pull request #39024 from Expensify/Rory-GenericConflictingRequests)
 };
 
 export default OpenReportParams;

src/libs/API/parameters/ReconnectAppParams.ts

@@ -2,7 +2,6 @@ type ReconnectAppParams = {
     mostRecentReportActionLastModified?: string;
     updateIDFrom?: number;
     policyIDList: string[];
-    idempotencyKey?: string;
 };
 
 export default ReconnectAppParams;

src/libs/Network/SequentialQueue.ts

@@ -1,6 +1,5 @@
 import Onyx from 'react-native-onyx';
 import * as ActiveClientManager from '@libs/ActiveClientManager';
-import {WRITE_COMMANDS} from '@libs/API/types';
 import * as Request from '@libs/Request';
 import * as RequestThrottle from '@libs/RequestThrottle';
 import * as PersistedRequests from '@userActions/PersistedRequests';
@@ -46,47 +45,6 @@ function flushOnyxUpdatesQueue() {
     QueuedOnyxUpdates.flushQueue();
 }
 
-/**
- * Identifies and removes conflicting requests from the queue
- */
-function reconcileRequests(persistedRequests: OnyxRequest[], commands: string[]) {
-    const requestsByActionID: Record<string, OnyxRequest[]> = {};
-
-    // Group requests by reportActionID
-    persistedRequests.forEach((request) => {
-        const {data} = request;
-        const reportActionID = data?.reportActionID as string;
-        if (reportActionID) {
-            if (!requestsByActionID[reportActionID]) {
-                requestsByActionID[reportActionID] = [];
-            }
-            requestsByActionID[reportActionID].push(request);
-        }
-    });
-
-    // Process requests with conflicting actions
-    Object.values(requestsByActionID).forEach((requests) => {
-        const conflictingRequests: OnyxRequest[] = [];
-        commands.forEach((command) => {
-            const conflictingRequest = requests.find((request) => request.command === command);
-            if (conflictingRequest) {
-                conflictingRequests.push(conflictingRequest);
-            }
-        });
-
-        if (conflictingRequests.length > 1) {
-            // Remove all requests as they cancel each other out
-            conflictingRequests.forEach((request) => {
-                // Perform action: Remove request from persisted requests
-                const index = persistedRequests.findIndex((req) => req === request);
-                if (index !== -1) {
-                    persistedRequests.splice(index, 1);
-                }
-            });
-        }
-    });
-}
-
 /**
  * Process any persisted requests, when online, one at a time until the queue is empty.
  *
@@ -106,10 +64,6 @@ function process(): Promise<void> {
         return Promise.resolve();
     }
 
-    // Remove conflicting requests from the queue to avoid processing them
-    const commands = [WRITE_COMMANDS.ADD_COMMENT, WRITE_COMMANDS.DELETE_COMMENT];
-    reconcileRequests(persistedRequests, commands);
-
     const requestToProcess = persistedRequests[0];
 
     // Set the current request to a promise awaiting its processing so that getCurrentRequest can be used to take some action after the current request has processed.

src/libs/Network/enhanceParameters.ts

@@ -36,8 +36,5 @@ export default function enhanceParameters(command: string, parameters: Record<st
 
     finalParameters.isFromDevEnv = Environment.isDevelopment();
 
-    // idempotencyKey declared in JS is front-end-only. We delete it here so it doesn't interfere with idempotency in other layers.
-    delete finalParameters.idempotencyKey;
-
     return finalParameters;
 }

src/libs/actions/App.ts

@@ -222,10 +222,7 @@ function openApp() {
 function reconnectApp(updateIDFrom: OnyxEntry<number> = 0) {
     console.debug(`[OnyxUpdates] App reconnecting with updateIDFrom: ${updateIDFrom}`);
     getPolicyParamsForOpenOrReconnect().then((policyParams) => {
-        const params: ReconnectAppParams = {
-            ...policyParams,
-            idempotencyKey: `${WRITE_COMMANDS.RECONNECT_APP}`,
-        };
+        const params: ReconnectAppParams = policyParams;
 
         // When the app reconnects we do a fast "sync" of the LHN and only return chats that have new messages. We achieve this by sending the most recent reportActionID.
         // we have locally. And then only update the user about chats with messages that have occurred after that reportActionID.
@@ -242,7 +239,9 @@ function reconnectApp(updateIDFrom: OnyxEntry<number> = 0) {
             params.updateIDFrom = updateIDFrom;
         }
 
-        API.write(WRITE_COMMANDS.RECONNECT_APP, params, getOnyxDataForOpenOrReconnect());
+        API.write(WRITE_COMMANDS.RECONNECT_APP, params, getOnyxDataForOpenOrReconnect(), {
+            getConflictingRequests: (persistedRequests) => persistedRequests.filter((request) => request?.command === WRITE_COMMANDS.RECONNECT_APP),
+        });
     });
 }
 

src/libs/actions/PersistedRequests.ts

@@ -18,17 +18,38 @@ function clear() {
 }
 
 function save(requestToPersist: Request) {
-    const requests = [...persistedRequests];
-    const existingRequestIndex = requests.findIndex((request) => request.data?.idempotencyKey && request.data?.idempotencyKey === requestToPersist.data?.idempotencyKey);
-    if (existingRequestIndex > -1) {
-        // Merge the new request into the existing one, keeping its place in the queue
-        requests.splice(existingRequestIndex, 1, requestToPersist);
-    } else {
-        // If not, push the new request to the end of the queue
-        requests.push(requestToPersist);
+    const requests = [...persistedRequests, requestToPersist];
+
+    // identify and handle any existing requests that conflict with the new one
+    const {getConflictingRequests, handleConflictingRequest, shouldIncludeCurrentRequest} = requestToPersist;
+    if (getConflictingRequests) {
+        // Get all the requests, potentially including the one we're adding, which will always be at the end of the array
+        const potentiallyConflictingRequests = shouldIncludeCurrentRequest ? requests : requests.slice(0, requests.length - 1);
+
+        // Identify conflicting requests according to logic bound to the new request
+        const conflictingRequests = getConflictingRequests(potentiallyConflictingRequests);
+
+        conflictingRequests.forEach((conflictingRequest) => {
+            // delete the conflicting request
+            const index = requests.findIndex((req) => req === conflictingRequest);
+            if (index !== -1) {
+                requests.splice(index, 1);
+            }
+
+            // Allow the new request to perform any additional cleanup for a cancelled request
+            handleConflictingRequest?.(conflictingRequest);
+        });
     }
-    persistedRequests = requests;
 
+    // Don't try to serialize conflict resolution functions
+    persistedRequests = requests.map((request) => {
+        delete request.getConflictingRequests;
+        delete request.handleConflictingRequest;
+        delete request.shouldIncludeCurrentRequest;
+        return request;
+    });
+
+    // Save the updated set of requests
     Onyx.set(ONYXKEYS.PERSISTED_REQUESTS, requests);
 }
 

src/libs/actions/Report.ts

@@ -612,7 +612,6 @@ function openReport(
         emailList: participantLoginList ? participantLoginList.join(',') : '',
         accountIDList: participantAccountIDList ? participantAccountIDList.join(',') : '',
         parentReportActionID,
-        idempotencyKey: `${SIDE_EFFECT_REQUEST_COMMANDS.OPEN_REPORT}_${reportID}`,
     };
 
     if (isFromDeepLink) {
@@ -627,7 +626,8 @@ function openReport(
     }
 
     // If we are creating a new report, we need to add the optimistic report data and a report action
-    if (!isEmptyObject(newReportObject)) {
+    const isCreatingNewReport = !isEmptyObject(newReportObject);
+    if (isCreatingNewReport) {
         // Change the method to set for new reports because it doesn't exist yet, is faster,
         // and we need the data to be available when we navigate to the chat page
         optimisticData[0].onyxMethod = Onyx.METHOD.SET;
@@ -711,7 +711,6 @@ function openReport(
 
         // Add the createdReportActionID parameter to the API call
         parameters.createdReportActionID = optimisticCreatedAction.reportActionID;
-        parameters.idempotencyKey = `${parameters.idempotencyKey}_NewReport_${optimisticCreatedAction.reportActionID}`;
 
         // If we are creating a thread, ensure the report action has childReportID property added
         if (newReportObject.parentReportID && parentReportActionID) {
@@ -737,7 +736,19 @@ function openReport(
         });
     } else {
         // eslint-disable-next-line rulesdir/no-multiple-api-calls
-        API.write(WRITE_COMMANDS.OPEN_REPORT, parameters, {optimisticData, successData, failureData});
+        API.write(
+            WRITE_COMMANDS.OPEN_REPORT,
+            parameters,
+            {optimisticData, successData, failureData},
+            {
+                getConflictingRequests: (persistedRequests) =>
+                    // requests conflict only if:
+                    // 1. they are OpenReport commands
+                    // 2. they have the same reportID
+                    // 3. they are not creating a report - all calls to OpenReport that create a report will be unique and have a unique createdReportActionID
+                    persistedRequests.filter((request) => request.command === WRITE_COMMANDS.OPEN_REPORT && request.data?.reportID === reportID && !request.data?.createdReportActionID),
+            },
+        );
     }
 }
 
@@ -1137,14 +1148,15 @@ function deleteReportComment(reportID: string, reportAction: ReportAction) {
         return;
     }
 
+    const isDeletedParentAction = ReportActionsUtils.isThreadParentMessage(reportAction, reportID);
     const deletedMessage: Message[] = [
         {
             translationKey: '',
             type: 'COMMENT',
             html: '',
             text: '',
             isEdited: true,
-            isDeletedParentAction: ReportActionsUtils.isThreadParentMessage(reportAction, reportID),
+            isDeletedParentAction,
         },
     ];
     const optimisticReportActions: NullishDeep<ReportActions> = {
@@ -1238,7 +1250,24 @@ function deleteReportComment(reportID: string, reportAction: ReportAction) {
     };
 
     CachedPDFPaths.clearByKey(reportActionID);
-    API.write(WRITE_COMMANDS.DELETE_COMMENT, parameters, {optimisticData, successData, failureData});
+
+    API.write(
+        WRITE_COMMANDS.DELETE_COMMENT,
+        parameters,
+        {optimisticData, successData, failureData},
+        {
+            getConflictingRequests: (persistedRequests) => {
+                const conflictingCommands = (
+                    isDeletedParentAction
+                        ? [WRITE_COMMANDS.UPDATE_COMMENT]
+                        : [WRITE_COMMANDS.ADD_COMMENT, WRITE_COMMANDS.ADD_ATTACHMENT, WRITE_COMMANDS.UPDATE_COMMENT, WRITE_COMMANDS.DELETE_COMMENT]
+                ) as string[];
+                return persistedRequests.filter((request) => conflictingCommands.includes(request.command) && request.data?.reportActionID === reportActionID);
+            },
+            handleConflictingRequest: () => Onyx.update(successData),
+            shouldIncludeCurrentRequest: !isDeletedParentAction,
+        },
+    );
 }
 
 /**

src/types/onyx/Request.ts

@@ -19,13 +19,40 @@ type RequestData = {
     successData?: OnyxUpdate[];
     failureData?: OnyxUpdate[];
     finallyData?: OnyxUpdate[];
-    idempotencyKey?: string;
-
+    getConflictingRequests?: (persistedRequests: Request[]) => Request[];
+    handleConflictingRequest?: (persistedRequest: Request) => unknown;
     resolve?: (value: Response) => void;
     reject?: (value?: unknown) => void;
 };
 
-type Request = RequestData & OnyxData;
+type RequestConflictResolver = {
+    /**
+     * A callback that's provided with all the currently serialized functions in the sequential queue.
+     * Should return a subset of the requests passed in that conflict with the new request.
+     * Any conflicting requests will be cancelled and removed from the queue.
+     *
+     * @example - In ReconnectApp, you'd only want to have one instance of that command serialized to run on reconnect. The callback for that might look like this:
+     * (persistedRequests) => persistedRequests.filter((request) => request.command === 'ReconnectApp')
+     * */
+    getConflictingRequests?: (persistedRequests: Request[]) => Request[];
+
+    /**
+     * Should the requests provided to getConflictingRequests include the new request?
+     * This is useful if the new request and an existing request cancel eachother out completely.
+     *
+     * @example - In DeleteComment, if you're deleting an optimistic comment, you'd want to cancel the optimistic AddComment call AND the DeleteComment call.
+     * */
+    shouldIncludeCurrentRequest?: boolean;
+
+    /**
+     * Callback to handle a single conflicting request.
+     * This is useful if you need to clean up some optimistic data for a request that was queue but never sent.
+     * In these cases the optimisticData will be applied immediately, but the successData, failureData, and/or finallyData will never be applied unless you do it manually in this callback.
+     */
+    handleConflictingRequest?: (persistedRequest: Request) => unknown;
+};
+
+type Request = RequestData & OnyxData & RequestConflictResolver;
 
 export default Request;
-export type {OnyxData, RequestType};
+export type {OnyxData, RequestType, RequestConflictResolver};