-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[HOLD for payment 2023-04-10] [$1000] Hovering over again to ‘Copy to clipboard’ seems to split the ‘Copy to clipboard’ into two lines in the second click for long emails #15949
Comments
Triggered auto assignment to @michaelhaxhiu ( |
Bug0 Triage Checklist (Main S/O)
|
@michaelhaxhiu Whoops! This issue is 2 days overdue. Let's get this updated quick! |
@michaelhaxhiu Still overdue 6 days?! Let's take care of this! |
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
Job added to Upwork: https://www.upwork.com/jobs/~0113ef7945a36f778f |
Current assignee @michaelhaxhiu is eligible for the External assigner, not assigning anyone new. |
Triggered auto assignment to Contributor-plus team member for initial proposal review - @eVoloshchak ( |
Triggered auto assignment to @flodnv ( |
All good, definitely |
@michaelhaxhiu Are external contributors allowed to post Proposal before the Help Wanted label is added? I just wonder. |
Edit: No changes have been announced yet. |
Let me see if this was formally announced yet. |
Example C+ review: |
Thanks for your help @situchan 👍 |
Yeah, I was following the contributing guideline. Found the discussion on slack, but can't find the official announcement if there was one. |
Hm I made a mistake in my explanation above actually. We haven't announced the unlocked behavior yet (and when we do, I think we'll likely adhere to the So for now we should be adhering to the guidance that's public. Which means proposals should only begin after the |
|
The solution for this issue has been 🚀 deployed to production 🚀 in version 1.2.93-4 and is now subject to a 7-day regression period 📆. Here is the list of pull requests that resolve this issue: If no regressions arise, payment will be issued on 2023-04-10. 🎊 After the hold period is over and BZ checklist items are completed, please complete any of the applicable payments for this issue, and check them off once done.
As a reminder, here are the bonuses/penalties that should be applied for any External issue:
|
BugZero Checklist: The PR fixing this issue has been merged! The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed:
|
@eVoloshchak Will you take the checklist or should I do it? |
I'll do it tomorrow |
Hmm I wonder if we need a regression test for this? Was the original design (splitting the text) done by design or mistake in the code? |
@michaelhaxhiu, It was due to a mistake in the code |
As @s77rt has previously said, this is a wrong calculation bug that has been revealed by this PR
|
Hi @michaelhaxhiu. I am the external reporter for this bug. Why is the melvin bot asking me to submit a PR? |
Sorry it's an automated action - it's because I assigned you to the GH. Ignore that please. |
Helping move this forward. Here's a regression test suggestion:
cc @eVoloshchak & @s77rt lmk if you agree or suggest a tweak |
@michaelhaxhiu I don't think that's the correct regression test, we can just use the PR Tests as the regression test. Regression Test Proposal
|
oh... duh. |
cool, works for me |
Checklist is satisfied. Closing. |
@flodnv @michaelhaxhiu Be sure to fill out the Contact List! |
The payments weren't issued yet, shouldn't this still be open? |
@michaelhaxhiu, I think this got closed out without issuing the payments, I still have the job in progress on Upwork |
For some reason payment didn't go through for you the first time, despite me doing it? Weird. I'll do yours now again. |
all set, sorry about that @eVoloshchak. I'm blaming Upwork this time because I'm certain I paid all 3 parties last week (yet yours failed). |
If you haven’t already, check out our contributing guidelines for onboarding and email contributors@expensify.com to request to join our Slack channel!
Action Performed:
Expected Result:
Hovering over again to ‘Copy to clipboard’ should not split the ‘Copy to clipboard’ into two lines in the second click for long emails. There should be consistency and it should display in the single line only.
Actual Result:
Hovering over again to ‘Copy to clipboard’ splits the ‘Copy to clipboard’ into two lines in the second click for long emails
Workaround:
unknown
Platforms:
Which of our officially supported platforms is this issue occurring on?
Version Number: 1.2.84-0
Reproducible in staging?: y
Reproducible in production?: y
If this was caught during regression testing, add the test name, ID and link from TestRail:
Email or phone of affected tester (no customers):
Logs: https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/4856
Notes/Photos/Videos:
Recording.1699.mp4
email.2.mp4
Expensify/Expensify Issue URL:
Issue reported by: @avi-shek-jha
Slack conversation: https://expensify.slack.com/archives/C049HHMV9SM/p1678781967498269
View all open jobs on GitHub
Upwork Automation - Do Not Edit
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: