Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[HOLD for payment 2024-04-15] IOU - Combined report appears briefly when navigating to IOU report from transaction thread #39418

Closed
6 tasks done
izarutskaya opened this issue Apr 2, 2024 · 13 comments
Assignees
Labels
Awaiting Payment Auto-added when associated PR is deployed to production Bug Something is broken. Auto assigns a BugZero manager. Engineering Weekly KSv2

Comments

@izarutskaya
Copy link

If you haven’t already, check out our contributing guidelines for onboarding and email contributors@expensify.com to request to join our Slack channel!


Version Number: 1.4.59-0
Reproducible in staging?: Y
Reproducible in production?: N
Logs: https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/4856
Issue reported by: Applause-Internal team

Action Performed:

  1. Go to staging.new.expensify.com
  2. Request money from a user that has no unsettled request.
  3. Create another IOU with the same user.
  4. Go to transaction details of one of the requests.
  5. Add some comments.
  6. Click on the header subtitle to return to IOU report.

Expected Result:

Combined report will not appear since there are more than one requests.

Actual Result:

Combined report appears briefly when navigating to IOU report from transaction thread.

Workaround:

Unknown

Platforms:

Which of our officially supported platforms is this issue occurring on?

  • Android: Native
  • Android: mWeb Chrome
  • iOS: Native
  • iOS: mWeb Safari
  • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • MacOS: Desktop

Screenshots/Videos

Bug6435642_1712067627162.20240402_221321.mp4

View all open jobs on GitHub

@izarutskaya izarutskaya added DeployBlockerCash This issue or pull request should block deployment Daily KSv2 Bug Something is broken. Auto assigns a BugZero manager. labels Apr 2, 2024
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Apr 2, 2024

Triggered auto assignment to @NikkiWines (DeployBlockerCash), see https://stackoverflowteams.com/c/expensify/questions/9980/ for more details.

Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Apr 2, 2024

Triggered auto assignment to @isabelastisser (Bug), see https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/14418 for more details.

@github-actions github-actions bot added Engineering Hourly KSv2 and removed Daily KSv2 labels Apr 2, 2024
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot removed the Hourly KSv2 label Apr 2, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Apr 2, 2024

👋 Friendly reminder that deploy blockers are time-sensitive ⏱ issues! Check out the open `StagingDeployCash` deploy checklist to see the list of PRs included in this release, then work quickly to do one of the following:

  1. Identify the pull request that introduced this issue and revert it.
  2. Find someone who can quickly fix the issue.
  3. Fix the issue yourself.

@izarutskaya
Copy link
Author

@isabelastisser I haven't added the External label as I wasn't 100% sure about this issue. Please take a look and add the label if you agree it's a bug and can be handled by external contributors.

@izarutskaya
Copy link
Author

We think this issue might be related to the #collect project.

@izarutskaya
Copy link
Author

Production

Recording.2332.mp4

@NikkiWines
Copy link
Contributor

Pretty sure this is tied to #39403 - seems like a similar bug. I'll work on a fix now 👍

Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Apr 2, 2024

⚠️ Looks like this issue was linked to a Deploy Blocker here

If you are the assigned CME please investigate whether the linked PR caused a regression and leave a comment with the results.

If a regression has occurred and you are the assigned CM follow the instructions here.

If this regression could have been avoided please consider also proposing a recommendation to the PR checklist so that we can avoid it in the future.

@NikkiWines
Copy link
Contributor

This is at least improved on staging where it's a much shorter loading period but will still look into resolving this fully 🤔

Screen.Recording.2024-04-02.at.15.15.41.mov

@NikkiWines
Copy link
Contributor

However, I think this can be a polish since it requires someone going through some niche steps to experience and won't be super easily found by users going through a normal flow

@NikkiWines NikkiWines added Daily KSv2 and removed DeployBlockerCash This issue or pull request should block deployment Weekly KSv2 Reviewing Has a PR in review labels Apr 2, 2024
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot added the Overdue label Apr 5, 2024
@NikkiWines
Copy link
Contributor

I'm not seeing this behavior on staging any more - let's close this out and if it pops up again it's a good external issue:

Screen.Recording.2024-04-05.at.18.33.45.mov
Screen.Recording.2024-04-05.at.18.35.09.mov

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot added Weekly KSv2 Awaiting Payment Auto-added when associated PR is deployed to production and removed Overdue Daily KSv2 labels Apr 6, 2024
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot changed the title IOU - Combined report appears briefly when navigating to IOU report from transaction thread [HOLD for payment 2024-04-15] IOU - Combined report appears briefly when navigating to IOU report from transaction thread Apr 8, 2024
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Apr 8, 2024

The solution for this issue has been 🚀 deployed to production 🚀 in version 1.4.60-13 and is now subject to a 7-day regression period 📆. Here is the list of pull requests that resolve this issue:

If no regressions arise, payment will be issued on 2024-04-15. 🎊

Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Apr 8, 2024

BugZero Checklist: The PR fixing this issue has been merged! The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed:

  • [@NikkiWines] The PR that introduced the bug has been identified. Link to the PR: [HOLD for payment 2024-04-15] IOU - Skeleton IOU preview appears in IOU details page when there is one request #39403
  • [@NikkiWines] The offending PR has been commented on, pointing out the bug it caused and why, so the author and reviewers can learn from the mistake. Link to comment: N/A, it was a bug due to not modifying code, not code that the PR had changed. We missed that flow in the original PR.
  • [@NikkiWines] A discussion in #expensify-bugs has been started about whether any other steps should be taken (e.g. updating the PR review checklist) in order to catch this type of bug sooner. Link to discussion: N/A
  • [@NikkiWines] Determine if we should create a regression test for this bug. N/A
  • [@NikkiWines] If we decide to create a regression test for the bug, please propose the regression test steps to ensure the same bug will not reach production again. N/A
  • [@isabelastisser] Link the GH issue for creating/updating the regression test once above steps have been agreed upon:

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Awaiting Payment Auto-added when associated PR is deployed to production Bug Something is broken. Auto assigns a BugZero manager. Engineering Weekly KSv2
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants